2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10041520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Soil-Available Potassium Content with Visible Near-Infrared Ray Spectroscopy of Different Pretreatment Transformations by the Boosting Algorithms

Abstract: The application of visible near-infrared (VIS-NIR) analysis technology to quantify the nutrients in soil has been widely recognized. It is important to improve the performance of regression models that can predict the soil-available potassium concentration. This study collected soil samples from southern Anhui, China, and concentrated on the modelling methods by using 29 pretreatment methods. The results show that a combination of three methods, Savitzky–Golay, standard normal variate, and dislodge tendency, e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper used determination coefficients (R 2 ), the root mean square error (RMSE), and the ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) to evaluate the accuracy of model inversion. These three statistical indicators have been widely used for regression models of the Vis-NIR spectrum [22,53,76,77]. Regarding the stability and fitness of the R 2 reaction model, the closer R 2 approached 1, the higher the model fit and the more stable it was.…”
Section: Accuracy Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper used determination coefficients (R 2 ), the root mean square error (RMSE), and the ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) to evaluate the accuracy of model inversion. These three statistical indicators have been widely used for regression models of the Vis-NIR spectrum [22,53,76,77]. Regarding the stability and fitness of the R 2 reaction model, the closer R 2 approached 1, the higher the model fit and the more stable it was.…”
Section: Accuracy Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of soil samples was 105, which were split into a calibration set and a validation set by the Kennard-Stone (KS) method at a proportion of 7:3 [53]. In reality, the levels of the soil properties were affected not only by the natural environment but also by human behaviors (i.e., before sample collection, there were fertilization activities in the field).…”
Section: Descriptive Statistics Of the Soil Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the years, calibration models have been improved, more soil characteristics have been calibrated and validated, and many of these have gradually been introduced into routine soil testing (Tables 2 and 4). Although there is some debate regarding the reliability of the use of RPD to evaluate NIRS [65,66], it has been used for several years by NIR scientists working on agricultural products and has been adopted by soil scientists [67]. We choose to give the RPD values in addition to R 2 , the root mean squared error (RMSE), and bias.…”
Section: Near Infrared Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger RPIQ value indicates improved model performance. A similar classification can be used for RPIQ and RPD (Jin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Criteria For Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%