2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of soil organic carbon and the C:N ratio on a national scale using machine learning and satellite data: A comparison between Sentinel-2, Sentinel-3 and Landsat-8 images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of overall model precision, the overall accuracy of the RF model was superior to the Cubist model, which is consistent with the results presented by Pouladi [81] in predicting soil organic matter distribution, who mapped and compared soil organic matter predictions by five models (Cubist, Random Forest, Cubist-kriging, Random Forest-kriging, Kriging) and obtained the same result as the model selected for this paper. Akpa [82] predicted SOC variation of different soil layers and the prediction showed that the RF model was slightly preferred to the Cubist model, and the classification of SOC at different resolutions has also been studied from the last few years [48]. However, SAR data were not analyzed with two different resolutions of spectral data.…”
Section: Sentinel-1a/2a/3a For Soc Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of overall model precision, the overall accuracy of the RF model was superior to the Cubist model, which is consistent with the results presented by Pouladi [81] in predicting soil organic matter distribution, who mapped and compared soil organic matter predictions by five models (Cubist, Random Forest, Cubist-kriging, Random Forest-kriging, Kriging) and obtained the same result as the model selected for this paper. Akpa [82] predicted SOC variation of different soil layers and the prediction showed that the RF model was slightly preferred to the Cubist model, and the classification of SOC at different resolutions has also been studied from the last few years [48]. However, SAR data were not analyzed with two different resolutions of spectral data.…”
Section: Sentinel-1a/2a/3a For Soc Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sentinel-3A OLCI image contains bare soil spectrums band for the surface bare soil monitoring capability, and although the spatial resolution is lower, the short revisit period and large land coverage can provide more comprehensive data for predicting SOC [90]. Combining Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-3A spectral data can make up for the deficiencies of both in many aspects, and can enhance the graphical prediction to a collection of spectral resolution from small to medium to large scale, thus enriching the remote sensing monitoring of soil data by spectral data [48].…”
Section: Sentinel-1a/2a/3a For Soc Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is necessary to explore the contribution of remote sensing data to SOC prediction. There have been some studies on SOC prediction based on remote sensing data that achieved good prediction results, especially optical data (e.g., Sentinel-2 [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], Landsat [22][23][24][25][26][27][28], and MODIS satellite data [29][30][31]); their bands cover from visible to short-wave infrared, providing more information. However, the application of optical data is susceptible to weather conditions, especially in the Sichuan Basin where clouds occur most frequently [32], so the available optical data are very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%