2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of spatial soil property information from ancillary sensor data using ordinary linear regression: Model derivations, residual assumptions and model validation tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpolated maps of HMs spatial distribution were generated using Surfer software version 9. In order to check the validity of performed estimations, the jack-knifing technique, the common technique of assessing the predictive capability of different regression models (Lesch and Corwin 2008), was used. Consequently, interpolated and actual (observed) values were compared using the error measurement of standardized root-meansquare error (RMSE %), which is calculated as follows (Hengl et al 2004):…”
Section: Geostatistical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpolated maps of HMs spatial distribution were generated using Surfer software version 9. In order to check the validity of performed estimations, the jack-knifing technique, the common technique of assessing the predictive capability of different regression models (Lesch and Corwin 2008), was used. Consequently, interpolated and actual (observed) values were compared using the error measurement of standardized root-meansquare error (RMSE %), which is calculated as follows (Hengl et al 2004):…”
Section: Geostatistical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the expectation and variance of the test statistic were computed using the formulas given in Lesch and Corwin (2008). Additionally, the normality assumption was assessed using standard residual quantilequantile plots and the Shapiro-Wilk test (Myers, 1986;Shapiro and Wilk, 1965).…”
Section: Model Specifi Cation and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of the model was based on the MLM approach. The statistical and geostatistical models listed in Table 2.4 are special cases derived from the MLM following a set of assumptions (Lesch and Corwin, 2008). The MLM formulation is (Hengl, 2009):…”
Section: Statistical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have used and sometimes compared several statistical methods such as simple linear regression (LR), multiple linear regression (MLR), variance analysis (ANOVA), covariance analysis (ANOCOVA) and kriging techniques, such as ordinary kriging (OK), cokriging, universal kriging (UK) and kriging with external drift (KED). These statistical and geostatistical techniques are derived from the general universal model of spatial variation as defined by Matheron (as cited in Hengl, 2009), which is also called the geostatistical mixed linear model (MLM) by Lesch and Corwin (2008). For any given dataset, the selection of an adequate prediction model derived from the MLM approach cannot be exclusively based on the model performance and goodness of fit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation