2016
DOI: 10.4103/2315-7992.190462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of stature from hand length and breadth – anthropometric study on an adult Cross River State population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study showed that the higher the standard error of estimates the lower the accuracy and reliability of prediction; while the lower the error, the higher the precision. This agrees with the work of Krishan et al [9] and Oria et al [16]. The finding of Pal et al [25] also estimated stature from hand dimensions in a Bengali population, West Bengal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The present study showed that the higher the standard error of estimates the lower the accuracy and reliability of prediction; while the lower the error, the higher the precision. This agrees with the work of Krishan et al [9] and Oria et al [16]. The finding of Pal et al [25] also estimated stature from hand dimensions in a Bengali population, West Bengal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Body mass, body mass index and body fat percentage were calculated with a Tanita BC 545 N device (Tanita Corp., Japan). Hand measurements were taken with a sliding calliper [8]. Hand length was assessed from the midpoint of the interstylon line to the tip of the middle finger.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was an attempt to provide a database for a Nigerian adult population by providing regression equations that are particluar to people of Nigerian decent. This database may be used whenever stature reconstruction is needed as a means of human identification in cases of disaster for victim identification and biological profiling [3,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%