2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-11573-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of student academic performance based on their emotional wellbeing and interaction on various e-learning platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors created social circumstances that called for the portrayal of emotions in order to make the game appealing. In [25] suggests a revolutionary Student Academic Performance Predicting (SAPP) system. It has a design a proper and forecasts whether pupils will pass or fail using a 4-layer stacked Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network, Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting (GB) technique combo.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors created social circumstances that called for the portrayal of emotions in order to make the game appealing. In [25] suggests a revolutionary Student Academic Performance Predicting (SAPP) system. It has a design a proper and forecasts whether pupils will pass or fail using a 4-layer stacked Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network, Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting (GB) technique combo.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental result is carried out by using the parameters such as accuracy, precision, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Root Absolute Error (RAE). These parameters are compared with three state of art methods such as Student Academic Performance Predicting (SAPP) system [25], Temporal Convolutional Neural Networks (T-CNN) [26], Attentive Interactive Student Performance prediction model (CAISP) [28]with the proposed Interaction students Education Neural network ( Int_Edu_NN) . These are analyzed for two datasets such as AffectNet and ASSIST2009.…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the highest predictive accuracy for students with grades of C (70-79) or below was only 63%. Ashima Kukkar et al [7] used a combination of a four-layer stacked long short-term memory (LSTM) network, random forest (RF), and gradient boosting (GB) techniques to predict whether students passed or failed, achieving an accuracy rate of 96% by verifying with the OULAD dataset. Wenjing Ban et al [8] designed a multi-algorithm online learning performance prediction framework that integrated neural networks, decision trees, K-nearest neighbors, random forests, and logistic regression algorithms to predict online learning performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input Features and Performance Focus Studies Performance Prediction using preadmission data High school GPA, GAT and Admission test scores (predict performance at the end of first year of undergrad program) (Tan et al, 2022), (Martínez-Navarro et al, 2021), (Alharthi, 2021), (Erika B. Varga, 2021), (Adekitan and N-Osaghae, 2019) Performance Prediction using academic data of undergrad program's initial years GPA of first-second year of undergrad program and grades in a some courses (predict graduating GPA) (Hashim et al, 2020), (Qazdar et al, 2019), (Miguéis et al, 2018), (Asif et al, 2017), (Hoffait and Schyns, 2017), (Jia and Maloney, 2015) Performance Prediction using low-cost variables Class participation, resource availability, heterogeneity, and class strength (predict future academic performance) (Tomasevic et al, 2020), (Yousafzai et al, 2020), (Xu et al, 2019), (Helal et al, 2018), (Sandoval et al, 2018), (Thiele et al, 2016), (Xing et al, 2015) Performance Prediction using non-academic variables in addition to academic data Behavioral and emotional characteristics, social and demographic features (forecast future academic performance) (Wild et al, 2023), (Kukkar et al, 2023), (Yao et al, 2019), (Nti et al, 2022), (Karagiannopoulou et al, 2021), (Keser and Aghalarova, 2021), (Fernandes et al, 2019), (Thiele et al, 2016)…”
Section: Factors For Categorizing Research Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some studies, only academic factors are not enough for performance pre diction, but socio-demographic factors can be beneficial too (Thiele et al, 2016;Wild et al, 2023;Kukkar et al, 2023;Nti et al, 2022). Yao et al (2019) predicted the performance of undergraduate students based on their behavior in school.…”
Section: Performance Prediction In Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%