2017
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2017.2766130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Subsurface NMR T2 Distributions in a Shale Petroleum System Using Variational Autoencoder-Based Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many empirical methods have been proposed for the estimation of permeability based on the characteristic parameters of the T 2 distribution in downhole NMR applications, including the Schlumberger-Doll Research (SDR) method and the Timur-Coates method (Daigle & Dugan, 2009;Liu et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019;Timur, 1968). However, existing NMR-based methods for S wb and permeability estimations generally require the inversion of the NMR echo data to obtain the T 2 distribution, which is an ill-posed problem of the Fredholm equation of the first kind (Li & Misra, 2017;Venkataramanan et al, 2002;Venkataramanan et al, 2010;Zou et al, 2015). Small changes in the measured NMR echo data due to noise can result in large differences in the T 2 distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many empirical methods have been proposed for the estimation of permeability based on the characteristic parameters of the T 2 distribution in downhole NMR applications, including the Schlumberger-Doll Research (SDR) method and the Timur-Coates method (Daigle & Dugan, 2009;Liu et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019;Timur, 1968). However, existing NMR-based methods for S wb and permeability estimations generally require the inversion of the NMR echo data to obtain the T 2 distribution, which is an ill-posed problem of the Fredholm equation of the first kind (Li & Misra, 2017;Venkataramanan et al, 2002;Venkataramanan et al, 2010;Zou et al, 2015). Small changes in the measured NMR echo data due to noise can result in large differences in the T 2 distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed comparison between different methods is shown in Table 3. Part (1) of Table 3 shows the LVQ classification accuracies under different sub-feature-extraction-methods that make up the DLVM, their values varies with different Classification accuracy % (10), and MIE(100) can better characterize S1 and S5. The EMD-AE and TIR have a good effect on the classification of S2 and S4.…”
Section: Lvq Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods have been proposed for the feature extraction and classification in the field of petroleum operation decision-making and system diagnosis [4], such as coastal oil tank detection [5], oil spill detection [6], pipeline leakage detection [7], tool wear prediction [8], and working status inspection [9]. Li [10] used nuclear magnetic resonance to investigate the internal structure of geomaterials filled with fluid. Firoozabadi [11] built a wellprediction model based on a pressure drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VAEs have met with great success in recent years in several applicative areas including anomaly detection [6][7][8][9], text classification [10], sentence generation [11], speech synthesis and recognition [12][13][14], spatio-temporal solar irradiance forecasting [15] and in geoscience for data assimilation [2]. In other respects, the two major application areas of the VAEs are the biomedical and healthcare recommendation [16][17][18][19], and industrial applications for nonlinear processes monitoring [1,3,4,[20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%