2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of surface charge on oxides in salt solutions: Revisions for 1:1 (M+L−) electrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
247
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
19
247
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For most of the oxide minerals, surface adsorption is mainly controlled by one hydroxylated metal cation, MeOH > surface site, resulting from the hydrolysis of adsorbed water molecules [11,57]. Calcite surface functional groups of the dominating crystallographic plane (calcite (1 0 4) surface) behave differently than those of oxides, because they are assumed to be controlled by two different types of sites resulting from the hydrolysis of surface water molecules: a hydroxylated calcium cation, >CaOH, and a protonated carbonate anion, >CO 3 H surface site [8,11].…”
Section: Calcite Surface Complexation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most of the oxide minerals, surface adsorption is mainly controlled by one hydroxylated metal cation, MeOH > surface site, resulting from the hydrolysis of adsorbed water molecules [11,57]. Calcite surface functional groups of the dominating crystallographic plane (calcite (1 0 4) surface) behave differently than those of oxides, because they are assumed to be controlled by two different types of sites resulting from the hydrolysis of surface water molecules: a hydroxylated calcium cation, >CaOH, and a protonated carbonate anion, >CO 3 H surface site [8,11].…”
Section: Calcite Surface Complexation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the knowledge of the surface adsorption properties of the ions can help to get information about tangential ionic mobility. Ions adsorbed as inner-sphere surface complexes lose part of their hydration shell and can be adsorbed at the close proximity of the mineral surface (Sverjensky 2005;Hiemstra & Van Riemsdijk 2006). The tangential mobility of these ions can hence be considerably smaller in the Stern layer than in bulk water.…”
Section: The New Surface Conductivity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tangential mobility of these ions can hence be considerably smaller in the Stern layer than in bulk water. Ions adsorbed as outer-sphere surface complexes keep their hydration shell and can be adsorbed further away from the mineral surface compared to inner-sphere surface complexes (Sverjensky 2005;Hiemstra & Van Riemsdijk 2006). The tangential mobility of these ions in the Stern layer can hence be comparable to their mobility in bulk water.…”
Section: The New Surface Conductivity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pokrovsky et al, 1999;Sverjensky, 2004). Among the most significant minerals in the subsurface, in terms of controlling the chemical composition and evolution of surface waters, are the phyllosilicates (including clays).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%