2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of surface roughness in slotting of CFRP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gara et al [33] analyzed the influence of tool geometry on surface roughness and showed that tool geometry has a significant effect on roughness, furthermore, average surface roughness is lower in the case of up milling than in the case of down milling, as it was confirmed in [34] work too. Halim et al [35] compared ultrasonic-assisted milling (UAM) with conventional milling in CFRP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Gara et al [33] analyzed the influence of tool geometry on surface roughness and showed that tool geometry has a significant effect on roughness, furthermore, average surface roughness is lower in the case of up milling than in the case of down milling, as it was confirmed in [34] work too. Halim et al [35] compared ultrasonic-assisted milling (UAM) with conventional milling in CFRP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The machinability of materials may be defined as a material property, as a factor in tool life, in terms of the cutting speed or other criteria [31]. Generally, the machinability of fibrous composites requires information on the (i) formation of chip, burr and delamination [32]; (ii) surface integrity [33]; (iii) tool life and tool wear rates [34]; (iv) specific cutting force, torque and shear stress [35]; (v) achievable micro and macro geometrical tolerances [36]; (vi) mechanical properties (e.g. hardness, resultant strength) [37]; and (vii) cutting temperature [38], at certain machining setups (machine tool, cutting tool, lubrication, temperature, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the cutting of CFRP composite materials is complicated and expensive: (i) due to the inhomogeneity and anisotropy of the material, the characteristic geometrical errors caused by the machining and the chip formation mechanisms are significantly dependent on the machining directions; (ii) carbon fibres have a strong abrasive wear effect, which should be considered for the cutting tool and for the machine tool also; and (iii) heat dissipation is also problematic due to the low thermal conductivity of polymers and the dangers of using coolant lubricants (polymer wicking) [2, 4-6, 14, 15]. Because of these cutting features and conditions, CFRP materials are referred to as difficult-to-cut materials, which can result in a variety of micro-and macro-geometric material defects like delamination, uncut fibres, matrix burning, fibre pull-outs, or micro-cracking [13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Although centuries of experience in the field of metalworking have been accumulated, this theoretical and practical knowledge cannot be directly applied to the cutting science of fibre-reinforced technical polymer composite materials that have been researched for only a few decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%