1999
DOI: 10.1115/1.2829574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Surface Wave Elevation Based on Pressure Measurements

Abstract: A deterministic method for predicting wave elevation based on pressure measurements is developed. The method is based on the hybrid wave model (HWM), which employs both conventional and phase modulation methods for modeling wave-wave interactions in an irregular wave train. The predicted wave elevation using the HWM based on the pressure measurement of a steep transient wave train is in excellent agreement with the corresponding elevation measurement, while that using linear wave theory (LWT) has relatively la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point, we remark that while some interesting experimental and numerical analyses of the pressure distribution have been undertaken for irregular waves in the literature (e.g. [15,18,19]), this paper will be focused primarily on regular waves. Among the issues considered in [18] is the need to offset any potential inaccuracies between theory and observations by multiplying the right-hand side of (3.5) with an empirical correction factor N, a constant which may vary depending on the local environment to which the particular dataset relates.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, we remark that while some interesting experimental and numerical analyses of the pressure distribution have been undertaken for irregular waves in the literature (e.g. [15,18,19]), this paper will be focused primarily on regular waves. Among the issues considered in [18] is the need to offset any potential inaccuracies between theory and observations by multiplying the right-hand side of (3.5) with an empirical correction factor N, a constant which may vary depending on the local environment to which the particular dataset relates.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%