2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0017-9310(01)00243-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of swirling confined diffusion flame with a Monte Carlo and a presumed-PDF-model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several numerical investigations have also been performed for turbulent combustion in this combustor [17][18][19]. TECFLAM test case S09C is chosen for the present calculation.…”
Section: Solution Procedures and Model Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several numerical investigations have also been performed for turbulent combustion in this combustor [17][18][19]. TECFLAM test case S09C is chosen for the present calculation.…”
Section: Solution Procedures and Model Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1i) [93][94][95][96] and the DLR gas turbine model combustor ( Fig. 1j) [97][98][99] are two more examples of nonpremixed, swirl-stabilized flames that have been extensively investigated using laser diagnostics.…”
Section: A Progression Of Target Flamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jochmann et al [32] compared the performance of the latter model with the RSM for predicting PVC in a gas turbine combustor and found the only slight differences exist between both models. Repp et al [33] used the k-ε model and a second moment closure to simulate a similar flame and reported fairly acceptable results by both models. Frassoldati et al [34] also used k-ε turbulence model to simulate a confined highly swirled flame and reported results that are in good agreement with measurements.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that in simulation of similar swirling flames similar levels of accuracy were reported in the work of Khelil et al [37], Frassoldati et al [51] and Repp at al. [52].…”
Section: Grid Independency and Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%