2019
DOI: 10.1177/1024907919855881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the central venous pressure in trauma patients on the basis of non-invasive parameters using artificial neural network

Abstract: Background: Generally, in traumatic patients, uncontrolled bleeding leads to shock and ultimately death. So, any early detection of shock can reduce the likelihood of a patient’s death. At present, the precise method for estimating the body’s need for fluids is to measure central venous pressure (CVP). However, this method is invasive and time consuming. Objective: This study aimed to predict the central venous pressure value and range of trauma patients through non-invasive parameters such as caval index, lac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, so far, many studies have been carried out to determine noninvasive parameters as representative of the CVP range, but the level of accuracy of these parameters remains unclear. [28] The effect of a high CVP may be more pronounced in the presence of elevated ICP. However, this is under special conditions in Fontan circulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, so far, many studies have been carried out to determine noninvasive parameters as representative of the CVP range, but the level of accuracy of these parameters remains unclear. [28] The effect of a high CVP may be more pronounced in the presence of elevated ICP. However, this is under special conditions in Fontan circulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ANN model constructed by Moinadini et al in 2019 used several clinical parameters, including the heart rate, SBP, caval index, lactate clearance and shock index, all of which showed an individual positive correlation with invasive CVP monitoring measurements. This model showed a sensitivity of 100% for normal CVP and 91% for elevated CVP (>8 mmHg) [ 228 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%