2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2994562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the Fresh Performance of Steel Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete Using Quadratic SVM and Weighted KNN Models

Abstract: Steel fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete (SFRSCC) is a special type of concrete that is widely researched in literature due to its superior properties. As it is difficult to provide its high workability qualities, SFRSCC is thought to be in need of an economic and quick design process. In this study, it is aimed to predict the fresh properties of SFRSCC mixtures following with the standards at the preliminary design stage. With this aim, two different classification methods were applied successfully to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…SVM with a quadratic polynomial kernel function [25, 26] that uses Bayesian optimization [27] for automatic parameterisation is more accurate than other classifiers for this problem. The weighted kNN [28], the Naive Bayesian classifier with Gaussian kernel [29], and a decision tree with 20 split numbers by Gini diversity index [30] were also used for this classification problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM with a quadratic polynomial kernel function [25, 26] that uses Bayesian optimization [27] for automatic parameterisation is more accurate than other classifiers for this problem. The weighted kNN [28], the Naive Bayesian classifier with Gaussian kernel [29], and a decision tree with 20 split numbers by Gini diversity index [30] were also used for this classification problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classification phase, decision tree (DT), linear discriminant (LD) [42], naı ¨ve Bayes (NB) [43], linear SVM (LSVM) [44], quadratic SVM (QSVM) [45], Cubic SVM (CSVM) [39], Gaussian SVM (GSVM) [39], k nearest neighbor (kNN) [46,47], bagged tree (BT) [48], and multilayer perceptron (MLP) [49] classifiers were used. The plot of accuracies (%) obtained using these classifiers is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Time Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metrics used are listed below in the article. TP is a true positive, TN is a true negative, FN is a false negative and FP is a false positive [23].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%