2002
DOI: 10.1093/bja/89.3.389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: comparison of laser-Doppler skin vasomotor reflex and pulse wave reflex

Abstract: Background. The laser-Doppler skin vasomotor reflex (SVmR) caused by tetanic stimulation of the ulnar nerve may be a test that can predict the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. A decrease in pulse wave amplitude (pulse wave reflex, PWR) may be an alternative index of this response. We compared the abilities of PWR and SVmR to predict the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and studied how alfentanil, muscle relaxation, stimulation site and stimulation pattern affected the two reflexes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous trials, rather short-lasting (5 or 10 s) tetanic stimuli have been used as an experimental non-invasive test stimulus to cause nociception during general anaesthesia. 27 Our study supports the previous finding that a short tetanic stimulus relatively poorly reflects the physiological response caused by a surgical stimulus. 21 It has been presumed that short electrical stimulus elicits mainly cutaneous pain mechanisms, whereas surgical tissue damage also contains deeper components.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In previous trials, rather short-lasting (5 or 10 s) tetanic stimuli have been used as an experimental non-invasive test stimulus to cause nociception during general anaesthesia. 27 Our study supports the previous finding that a short tetanic stimulus relatively poorly reflects the physiological response caused by a surgical stimulus. 21 It has been presumed that short electrical stimulus elicits mainly cutaneous pain mechanisms, whereas surgical tissue damage also contains deeper components.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Before induction, the patients were randomly assigned to five treatment groups differing in target BIS level, and in remifentanil bolus and infusion rates using a stratified randomization protocol. In Groups 1 -3, a propofol targetcontrolled infusion (Diprifusorw, AstraZeneca, Grafenau, Switzerland) was titrated to achieve a BIS level of 45 (5), whereas in Groups 4 and 5 the target BIS levels were 30 (5) and 60(5), respectively. In Groups 1 -3, remifentanil was administered with an initial bolus of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mg kg 21 immediately followed by an infusion of 0.04, 0.08, and 0.2 mg kg 21 min 21 , respectively.…”
Section: Study Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some electroencephalographic (EEG)-derived parameters, such as Entropy, are suggested to reflect also the nociceptive component of anesthesia [35]. Changes in skin conductivity and suppression of photoplethysmographic pulse wave amplitude (PPWA) have also been proposed as indicators of nociception [6, 7]. Recently, Surgical Stress Index (SSI), based on a sum of normalized pulse beat interval (PBI) and PPWA, was introduced for the assessment of surgical stress or nociception [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%