Prediction of the Nonlinear Dynamics of a Multiple Flame Combustor by Coupling the Describing Function Methodology With a Helmholtz Solver

Abstract

This study focuses on the numerical determination of thermo-acoustic instabilities using a combination of the Flame Describing Function (FDF) methodology and a numerical code solving the Helmholtz equation. In this framework, the FDF is defined by a set of Flame Transfer Functions (FTF) that depend on both the frequency and amplitude of acoustic perturbations. The FDF methodology has been recently used in combination with acoustic network methods to examine the nonlinear stability of generic configurations with simplified geometries. Its extension to complex 3D geometries requires the use of numerical tools such as a Helmholtz solver. In the present work, that combination is validated on a multiple injection combustor. The implementation of the FDF methodology in the Helmholtz solver is detailed before examining numerical predictions obtained by the use of an experimentally determined FDF in the Helmholtz solver. The instability frequencies and growth rates are determined for each perturbation level and different nonlinear behaviors are exhibited depending on the combustor geometry. The case of linearly unstable modes reaching limit cycles is first examined. A more complex case involving mode switching is then examined when two unstable modes are present. In this situation, the most unstable mode in the linear regime triggers another * Address all correspondence to this author: alexis.cuquel@ecp.fr unstable mode at a higher perturbation level. These numerical calculations are compared with experimental data and exhibit a good match in terms of amplitude and frequency reached by the limit cycle.

Uncertainty Quantification of Growth Rates of Thermoacoustic Instability by an Adjoint Helmholtz Solver

“…(5) means finding simultaneously the values of σ andp that satisfy Eqn. (5). It should be noted that for a passive flame, where G = 0 and therefore H = 0, and for open (Bp =p) or closed (Bp = ∇p) acoustic boundary conditions, the eigenvalue problem becomes linear in σ .…”

“…Appendix A: Using Finite Differences to compute the derivatives of the operator N (σ , η) with respect to σ and η After discretization by finite volumes of the Helmholtz equation (5), the operators A , H and B become square matrices of size N × N, where N is the number of nodes considered. In this study, numerical convergence was reached for N > 6000.…”

“…In this case, the effects of flame dynamics are included by coupling a Helmholtz solver with a suitable Flame Transfer Function (FTF). Recent studies have also demonstrated the potential of this hybrid approach to evaluate limit cycle amplitudes when used in combination with a Flame Describing Function [4,5].…”

Analysis of Thermoacoustic Instabilities Using the Helmholtz Method in a Swirled Premixed Combustor

“…The results indicated that the flame shape had a weak influence at low frequencies due to the small flame scale compared with the acoustic wavelength, while the opposite results were found at high frequencies. Cuquel et al [29] compared the numerical results with experimental ones and those calculated using the low-order model. Both linear and nonlinear unstable modes, as well as the frequency and amplitude, can be obtained using the Helmholtz solver.…”