2023
DOI: 10.1002/gj.4756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the pore structure by machine learning techniques in the carbonate reservoirs in Iraq H oilfield

Abstract: Pore structure impacts the capability of seepage pattern of subsurface fluid mineral and mineral exploitation efficiency. Because of the strong heterogeneity in carbonate reservoirs, the pore structure is nonlinearly varying and complex in reservoirs. It is necessary to establish a method for pore structure type (PST) prediction. Machine learning provides an efficient prediction method by finding the relationship between core test data and well‐logging data. In this paper, a reservoir identification method bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning presents a promising solution by establishing a correlation between core test data and well logging data for predicting PS characteristics. Lu et al (2023) propose a Gradient Boost Tree (GBDT)-based reservoir identification method for predicting PS characteristics in carbonate reservoirs by integrating core test and logging data. They utilize core testing data to generate a training set for PS prediction and employ the mutual information method to optimize logging data as the input for the machine learning model.…”
Section: Research Outputs Of This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning presents a promising solution by establishing a correlation between core test data and well logging data for predicting PS characteristics. Lu et al (2023) propose a Gradient Boost Tree (GBDT)-based reservoir identification method for predicting PS characteristics in carbonate reservoirs by integrating core test and logging data. They utilize core testing data to generate a training set for PS prediction and employ the mutual information method to optimize logging data as the input for the machine learning model.…”
Section: Research Outputs Of This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the effect of the DNN model more comprehensively, we selected three mature machine learning algorithms, i.e., Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest Regression (RFR) and XGBoost Regression (XGBR), which have been proved to be effective in petrophysical characterization and microscopic heterogeneity [51][52][53], to synchronously predict the pore-throat radius. Support Vector Regression, which is derived from Support Vector Machine, is used to find a hyper-plane that has the smallest margin of ε deviation from the actually obtained targets [71]; meanwhile, the ε tube needs to involve the maximum number of training data.…”
Section: Pore-throat Radius Prediction By Comparable Machine Learning...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, in regard to petrophysical characterization and microscopic heterogeneity, many machine learning methods have been devoted to generating more accurate predictions. Lu et al [51] predicted the pore structure type of the carbonate reservoirs in the Iraq H oilfield by using Gradient Boost Decision Trees and Support Vector Regression. In the procedure of analyzing the permeability contribution of multiscale pore structure, Wang and Sun [52] classified a multiscale pore structure into different rock types using the Random Forest algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%