2017
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b7.bjj-2017-0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the pre-morbid 3D anatomy of the proximal humerus based on statistical shape modelling

Abstract: This study reports a novel, computerised method that accurately predicts the pre-morbid proximal humeral anatomy even in challenging situations. This information can be used in the surgical planning and operative reconstruction of patients with severe degenerative osteoarthritis or with a fracture of the proximal humerus. Cite this article: 2017;99-B:927-33.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
31
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies by Poltaretskyi et al 4 and our group 5 are closely related to the present work. In those studies, another approach was presented for the generation of a 3D reconstruction template: use of a statistical shape model (SSM).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent studies by Poltaretskyi et al 4 and our group 5 are closely related to the present work. In those studies, another approach was presented for the generation of a 3D reconstruction template: use of a statistical shape model (SSM).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The approximation of the proximal humeral anatomy with the bilateral registration of the bicipital groove seems to be more accurate than the SSM. The mean p-HCR error around the y axis using the groove-75-85 segment was 2.1°± 1.6°, while the corresponding error in retrotorsion with the SSM of Poltaretskyi et al 4 was 3.8°± 2.9°. The 3D p-HCR in the present study using the groove-75-85 segment was 2.8°± 1.5°, while the error of the SSM with the distal-85 segment 5 was 3.8°± 1.9°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SSM has been used for shape reconstructions from partial information [34,35]. The SSM was fitted on the known part of the shape and, thus, the missing part of the shape was reconstructed according to the instance of the model.…”
Section: ) Posterior Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 Around the glenohumeral joint, SSM has mainly been used to approximate native anatomy for anatomic structures with bony defects. [23][24][25] However, SSM is an ideal tool to objectively quantify shape variability within a given set of samples, without idealizing the underlying anatomy. 21 Therefore, the goal of this study was to use SSM to identify the hierarchy of anatomic variance of the articular and periarticular anatomy of the scapula, and to quantify shape variation of the periarticular anatomy of the scapula in relation to the glenoid in nonpathologic shoulders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%