2009
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2009.2018600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the SINR RMS in the IEEE 802.16 OFDMA System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SINR in Figs 3-7 and 8 was controlled with the transmit power of users. The SINR at the femto BS is expressed as follows (similar to those of Refs [23,24]):…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SINR in Figs 3-7 and 8 was controlled with the transmit power of users. The SINR at the femto BS is expressed as follows (similar to those of Refs [23,24]):…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SINR in Figs 3–7 and 8 was controlled with the transmit power of users. The SINR at the femto BS is expressed as follows (similar to those of Refs [23,24]): italicSINRgoodbreak=k=1KPSfalse(kfalse)PLSfalse(kfalse)j=1JPIfalse(jfalse)PLIfalse(jfalse)+Nn$$ SINR=\frac{\sum_{k=1}^K{P}_S^{(k)}\cdot {PL}_S^{(k)}}{\sum_{j=1}^J{P}_I^{(j)}\cdot {PL}_I^{(j)}+{N}_n} $$ where PSfalse(kfalse)$$ {P}_S^{(k)} $$ denotes the transmit power of observed femto user, PLSfalse(kfalse)$$ {PL}_S^{(k)} $$ is the path loss from femto user to the observed femto BS, the superscript false(false)false(kfalse)$$ {\left(\cdot \right)}^{(k)} $$ indicates the k th femto user, PIfalse(jfalse)$$ {P}_I^{(j)} $$ is the transmit power as interference caused by the macro user, PLIfalse(jfalse)$$ {PL}_I^{(j)} $$ is the path loss caused by the distance between macro user to the femto BS, the superscript false(false)false(jfalse)$$ {\left(\cdot \right)}^{(j)} $$ indicates the j th macro user, and N n is the noise power. The received interference power caused by the macro user can be calculated using PitalicRX_I=...…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some TTI metrics may be zero, due to eNodeB scheduler algorithm, in which case we use an interpolator to fill in missing data, and then smooth. We introduce (optionally) a non-linearity, which is 10log() in our case, in line with producing homoscedasticity, that is, to try to make variances homogeneous across metrics of interest (in time), if needed, as described in [14]. [14] uses a log non-linearity to produce homoscedasticity for heteroscedastic SINR RMS(Root Mean Square) value prediction for IEEE 802.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some TTI metrics may be zero, due to eNodeB scheduler algorithm, in which case we use an interpolator to fill in missing data, and then smooth. We introduce (optionally) a non-linearity, which is 10log() in our case, in line with producing homoscedasticity, that is, to try to make variances homogeneous across metrics of interest (in time), if needed, as described in [14]. [14] uses a log non-linearity to produce homoscedasticity for heteroscedastic SINR RMS(Root Mean Square) value prediction for IEEE 802.16.…”
Section: The Enodeb Obtains the Number Of Physical Resource Blocks (Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used the poly-fit function over finite durations of 10 to 100 m-secs, where the process may be considered somewhat stationary. However, still variations of the central moments in the signal remain and we use the non-linearity of [14] to ensure we get a good prediction performance.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%