2018
DOI: 10.3311/ppci.13035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Modulus of Elasticity in Calcareous Mudstones Using Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems, and Regression Analysis

Abstract: The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and modulus of elasticity (E) are two important rock geomechanical parameters that are widely used in rock engineering projects such as tunnels, dams, and rock slope stability. Since the acquisition of high-quality core samples is not always possible, researchers often indirectly estimate these parameters. In the present study, prediction of UCS and E was investigated in calcareous mudstones of Aghajari Formation using multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple nonlinear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Umrao et al [ 38 ] used the ANFIS procedure to predict the UCS and E of various sedimentary rocks. Mahdiabadi and Khanlari [ 39 ] used multiple linear regression, multiple nonlinear regression, multilayer perceptron, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inferences systems for UCS and E prediction. They used 80 samples that were recovered from calcareous mudstones of the Aghajari Formation located in Tehran, Iran, as the main data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Umrao et al [ 38 ] used the ANFIS procedure to predict the UCS and E of various sedimentary rocks. Mahdiabadi and Khanlari [ 39 ] used multiple linear regression, multiple nonlinear regression, multilayer perceptron, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inferences systems for UCS and E prediction. They used 80 samples that were recovered from calcareous mudstones of the Aghajari Formation located in Tehran, Iran, as the main data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the UCS was obtained mainly through laboratory uniaxial compression tests using the standards proposed by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or the International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM) [7][8][9][10]. Nevertheless, the laboratory experiments of UCS have been controversial for three reasons, including time-consuming, cost-ineffective, and rock sample quality-dependent [2,[11][12][13]. Therefore, it is practically meaningful and scientifically significant to develop economical and effective but robust methods to obtain UCS to meet the needs of engineering practices and research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical characteristics of investigated rocks such as P wave velocity, dry density, porosity, and water absorption were used as model inputs, whereas UCS and E were used as output factors to build the prediction models. Mahdiabadi and Khanlari (2019) used MLR, multiple nonlinear regression, artificial neural networks, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to predict UCS and E in calcareous mudstones of the Aghajari Formation. The point loading, block punch, and cylinder punch tests were performed on samples of calcareous mudstones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%