PsycEXTRA Dataset 1964
DOI: 10.1037/e438672004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of unsuitability among first-term airmen from aptitude indexes, high school reference data, and basic training evaluations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction made by school officials of the subjects' adjustment to the Corps was measured by a questionnaire sent to the school by the U. S. Navy Medical Neuropsychiatric Research Unit. That questionnaire is a modified version of one developed by Flyer (1963). It was to be completed either by the principal, a guidance counselor, or a teacher who knew the subject, and required information from school records as well as subjective opinions by the rater as to school achievement, extracurricular acthose of the author and are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the official view or endorsement of the Department of the Navy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction made by school officials of the subjects' adjustment to the Corps was measured by a questionnaire sent to the school by the U. S. Navy Medical Neuropsychiatric Research Unit. That questionnaire is a modified version of one developed by Flyer (1963). It was to be completed either by the principal, a guidance counselor, or a teacher who knew the subject, and required information from school records as well as subjective opinions by the rater as to school achievement, extracurricular acthose of the author and are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the official view or endorsement of the Department of the Navy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, applicants who were younger and had lower aptitude scores and less formal education exhibited a higher probability of loss due to misconduct, failure to adapt, unfitness, or poor performance, These general trends have been demonstrated consistently for recruit populations entering the Air Force (Carpenter & Christal, 1973.;Fisher, Ward, Holdrepe, & Lawrence, 1960;Flyer, 1959Flyer, , 1963Gordon & Bottenberg, 1962;Guinn, 1973), the U,S. Army (Erwin & Herring, 1977, Klleger, Dubuisson, & dejung, 1961Shoemaker, Drucker, & Kriner, 1974), the Navy and the Marine Corps (Goodstadt & Glickman, 1975;Plag & Goffmnn, 1966;Sands, 1977Sands, , 1978.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Flyer (1959Flyer ( , 1963, and other military researchers concerning the effects of education, background, . ' and aptitude on prediposition toward attrition.…”
Section: Dismcussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%