2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-019-04290-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Wax Appearance Temperature Using Artificial Intelligent Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Waxes, as opposed to asphaltenes which are a subclass of aromatics, are mixtures of heavy n-alkanes and i-alkanes (paraffins) [188]. Although mostly encountered in surface facilities, risers, pipelines and separators, and not in subsurface systems like the reservoir and the wellbore, it is worth mentioning several researchers who have focused on predicting wax deposition conditions and amount, like Amar et al [197] who developed an MLP optimized with LM and Bayesian Regularization algorithms to predict the deposited wax amount during production and Benamara et al [198] who used the same methodology to determine the Wax Appearance Temperature (WAT). In another study, Benamara et al [199] built RBFNN models coupled with two optimization algorithms, namely GA and Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) [200], to predict the WAT.…”
Section: Machine Learning Methods For Flow Assurance Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waxes, as opposed to asphaltenes which are a subclass of aromatics, are mixtures of heavy n-alkanes and i-alkanes (paraffins) [188]. Although mostly encountered in surface facilities, risers, pipelines and separators, and not in subsurface systems like the reservoir and the wellbore, it is worth mentioning several researchers who have focused on predicting wax deposition conditions and amount, like Amar et al [197] who developed an MLP optimized with LM and Bayesian Regularization algorithms to predict the deposited wax amount during production and Benamara et al [198] who used the same methodology to determine the Wax Appearance Temperature (WAT). In another study, Benamara et al [199] built RBFNN models coupled with two optimization algorithms, namely GA and Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) [200], to predict the WAT.…”
Section: Machine Learning Methods For Flow Assurance Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LMA is the commonly employed backpropagation-based approach for MLP weights and bias optimization since it has a high aptitude to obtain their final solutions regardless of the distance from the starting point. 96 LMA uses the principles of Newton's method with fair modifications in their conceptions, where in this algorithm the Hessian matrix is estimated instead of directly calculated, and an additional parameter known as the regularization parameter, which improves the stability during the calculation process, is proposed. The expressions of the gradient matrix as well as the approximated Hessian matrix evolved in LMA are shown below: 97…”
Section: Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bian et al 42 developed a metaheuristic algorithm (GWO) to optimize neural networks to predict the WAT of crude oil. Benamara et al 43 predicted WAT by using Levenberg−Marquardt algorithm and Bayesian regularization algorithm optimized gene expression programming and multilayer perceptron to predict density, viscosity, pour point, and wax content as input parameters, and the model results met engineering requirements.…”
Section: Crystallization Properties and Phase Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%