2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.11.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction uncertainty assessment of chromatography models using Bayesian inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to increasing computational power as well as the improved use of process analytical technologies, novel computational approaches for complex upstream and downstream processes are in the focus of recent interest [1] , [2] , [3] . While mechanistic kinetic-dispersive models are nowadays considered as standard methods for the study of capturing and polishing steps in downstream operations [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , there exist a plethora of distinct models for upstream processes with certain advantages and shortcomings. The large number of modelling approaches may be related to the importance of correlated molecular mechanisms at distinct length scales as well as the broad variability of biological parameters among living organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to increasing computational power as well as the improved use of process analytical technologies, novel computational approaches for complex upstream and downstream processes are in the focus of recent interest [1] , [2] , [3] . While mechanistic kinetic-dispersive models are nowadays considered as standard methods for the study of capturing and polishing steps in downstream operations [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , there exist a plethora of distinct models for upstream processes with certain advantages and shortcomings. The large number of modelling approaches may be related to the importance of correlated molecular mechanisms at distinct length scales as well as the broad variability of biological parameters among living organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has demonstrated the predictive power of SMA models, even when extrapolating beyond the experimental conditions applied for model calibration (Briskot et al, 2019). Despite the proven predictive power and the mechanistic nature of the SMA model, it is not clear which structural characteristics of mAbs influence adsorption model parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mechanistic modeling of mAbs and other proteins in ion exchange chromatography, the SMA adsorption isotherm is frequently used in academic and industrial case studies. 16,[28][29][30][31][32][33] The SMA isotherm describes the multipoint binding of proteins to the resin under consideration of a protein's characteristic charge, the thermodynamic equilibrium of the adsorption process, and steric shielding effects. Multiple studies have demonstrated successful application of mechanistic models for the scale-up of chromatography processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They consist of partial differential equations, describing macroscopic transport through the column, mass transport within the stationary phase, and adsorption of protein to the resin. For mechanistic modeling of mAbs and other proteins in ion exchange chromatography, the SMA adsorption isotherm is frequently used in academic and industrial case studies 16,28‐33 . The SMA isotherm describes the multipoint binding of proteins to the resin under consideration of a protein's characteristic charge, the thermodynamic equilibrium of the adsorption process, and steric shielding effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%