2010
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/27/17/173001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions for the rates of compact binary coalescences observable by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors

Abstract: We present an up-to-date, comprehensive summary of the rates for all types of compact binary coalescence sources detectable by the initial and advanced versions of the ground-based gravitational-wave detectors LIGO and Virgo. Astrophysical estimates for compact-binary coalescence rates depend on a number of assumptions and unknown model parameters and are still uncertain. The most confident among these estimates are the rate predictions for coalescing binary neutron stars which are based on extrapolations from… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

63
1,322
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,062 publications
(1,395 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
63
1,322
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since globular clusters are the most likely hosts of IMBHs, we convert our overall search upper limit into an astrophysical density of 3×10 3 GC −1 Gyr −1 . This rate is still few orders of magnitude above the predictions for IMBH-IMBH rates in [41]. It should be noted, however, that the predicted astrophysical rates are very uncertain due to the lack of knowledge of the distribution and formation of IMBH sources.…”
Section: B Visible Volume and Rate Limitsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since globular clusters are the most likely hosts of IMBHs, we convert our overall search upper limit into an astrophysical density of 3×10 3 GC −1 Gyr −1 . This rate is still few orders of magnitude above the predictions for IMBH-IMBH rates in [41]. It should be noted, however, that the predicted astrophysical rates are very uncertain due to the lack of knowledge of the distribution and formation of IMBH sources.…”
Section: B Visible Volume and Rate Limitsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Concerning the rate of IMBH-IMBH coalescence, the upper limit has been estimated at 0.07 GC −1 Gyr −1 [41].…”
Section: A Intermediate Mass Black Hole Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low-metallicity environment may also affect the binary fraction and merging delay time. We note that the expected rate of neutron star mergers is uncertain to 1-2 orders of magnitude even in the local universe 50 . A neutron star binary may experience large velocity kicks during its formation, which can eject the binary from its host galaxy and further reduce the expected rate of these mergers 51 .…”
Section: Expected Event Ratementioning
confidence: 85%
“…They are the most promising sources of GWs in a series of advanced detectors such as LIGO [1], Virgo [2] and KAGRA [3], which will be operated within next five years. Especially binary neutron star mergers (BNSs) may be the most common source with realistic detection rate of ∼40 yr −1 [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%