2004
DOI: 10.1086/381177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions of Mixed Non‐Gaussian Cosmological Density Fields for the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation

Abstract: We present simulations of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) power spectrum for a class of mixed, non-Gaussian, primordial random fields. We assume a skew-positive mixed model with adiabatic inflation perturbations plus additional isocurvature perturbations possibly produced by topological defects. The joint probability distribution used in this context is a weighted combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian random fields, such as Pð Þ ¼ ð1 À Þ f 1 ð Þ þ f 2 ð Þ, where f 1 ð Þ is a Gaussian distri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the first serious constraints on an uncorrelated mixed model [29], and after ruling out pure CDM isocurvature [30], various mixtures of the adiabatic and isocurvature modes have been tested. In particular, since the release of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data, observational constraints have been obtained, e.g., by [10,27,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45] for WMAP1 [46], by [47,48,49,50,51,52] for WMAP3 [53] and most recently for WMAP5 [54] by [28], and by [55] in the particular case of axion (uncorrelated, n iso = 1). In [28] it is shown that the CDM isocurvature mode is not required by a combination of current data if flatness is assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the first serious constraints on an uncorrelated mixed model [29], and after ruling out pure CDM isocurvature [30], various mixtures of the adiabatic and isocurvature modes have been tested. In particular, since the release of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data, observational constraints have been obtained, e.g., by [10,27,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45] for WMAP1 [46], by [47,48,49,50,51,52] for WMAP3 [53] and most recently for WMAP5 [54] by [28], and by [55] in the particular case of axion (uncorrelated, n iso = 1). In [28] it is shown that the CDM isocurvature mode is not required by a combination of current data if flatness is assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of such mixed models in the CMBR power spectrum, combining a Gaussian adiabatic field with a second nonGaussian isocurvature fluctuation field to produce a positive skewness density field, was discussed by Andrade et al (2004) (hereafter AWR04). In this approach, they adopted a scaledependent mixture parameter and a power-law initial spectrum to simulate the CMBR temperature and polarization power spectra for a flat Λ-CDM model, generating a large grid of cosmological-parameter combination.…”
Section: The Mixture Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of realizations of CMBR temperature power spectra were made and the mean temperature fluctuations combining Gaussian, Exponential, Lognormal, Rayleigh, Maxwellian and a Chi-squared distributions was estimated (Andrade et al 2004). The simulations show that the influence of the specific statistics of the second component in the mixed field is not so important as the cross-correlation between the amplitudes of both fields.…”
Section: B the Evolution Of The Mixed Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andrade et al (2004) have suggested a new mixed scenario describing a correlated mixture of two fields, one of them being a dominant Gaussian adiabatic process to which is added a small contribution of an isocurvature field. In a previous work, Ribeiro, Wuensche & Letelier (2000) used such mixed scenario to probe the galaxy cluster abundance evolution in the universe and found that even a very small level of nonGaussianity in the mixed field may introduce significant changes in the cluster abundance rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation