2010
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1301-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions of the Quark–Gluon String Model for pp at LHC

Abstract: Soft multiparticle production processes in hadronic collisions are considered in the framework of the QuarkGluon Strings Model and the model predictions are compared with data from SppS and Tevatron. Predictions for LHC energies are given.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the model comparisons we have used QGSM [6], three different tunes of PYTHIA, tune D6T [9], tune ATLAS-CSC [10] and tune Perugia-0 [11], and PHO-JET [12]. The PYTHIA tunes have been developed by three independent groups extensively comparing Monte Carlo distributions to underlying-event and minimum-bias Tevatron [4] (stars) and to model predictions, PYTHIA tune D6T [9] (solid line) and PHOJET [12] (dashed line).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the model comparisons we have used QGSM [6], three different tunes of PYTHIA, tune D6T [9], tune ATLAS-CSC [10] and tune Perugia-0 [11], and PHO-JET [12]. The PYTHIA tunes have been developed by three independent groups extensively comparing Monte Carlo distributions to underlying-event and minimum-bias Tevatron [4] (stars) and to model predictions, PYTHIA tune D6T [9] (solid line) and PHOJET [12] (dashed line).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used the first high energy proton-proton collisions at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy √ s = 2.36 TeV, as well as a larger statistics data sample at √ s = 0.9 TeV, to determine the pseudorapidity density of charged-primary particles, 1 dN ch /dη, in the central pseudorapidity region (|η| < 1.4). According to commonly used models [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], an increase in dN ch /dη of 17-22% for INEL events and of 14-19% for NSD events is expected in 2.36 TeV collisions relative to 0.9 TeV collisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where σ Int. is the interaction crosssection (see for instance [18][19][20][21]). Up to LHC energies, σ Int.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here diagram (a) shows the soft multi-Pomeron exchange, diagram (b) represents both hard and soft Pomeron exchange, diagrams (c) and (d) show the single diffractive (SD) process with small (c) and large (d) mass excitation, and diagrams (e)-(g) display double diffractive (DD) processes with large (e) and small (f) mass excitation, and central diffraction (g). The cross sections of SD and DD processes in pp collisions were calculated within the QGSM in [15]. In our MC version, we utilize the following parametrization of these results proposed in [16] …”
Section: The Qgsm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%