XTxmtBaua am rvvwM sirfa ff nanzeaaary and Identify by block number) SSV/4589 Three different two-phase flow codes (University of Illinois, Calspan, Gough) have been compared by application to a 155mm howitzer high zone charge with input data derived from independent measurements or analysis. Code predictions were compared with firing test values and with a lumped parameter code. Quantitative comparisons are reported for pressure difference waves, peak breech pressure, rise time and travel at peak pressure, flame spreading rate, and CPU time. The major findings were that (1) each code predicts different pressure DO 1 JAM 73 1^73 EDITION OF I NOV 65 IS OBSOLETE UNCLASSIFIED SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Whan Data Entered) UNCLASSIFIED SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfWInn Dmf Bntertd) waves, (2) pressure wave predictions are insensitive to the presence of the central core igniter, and (3) nominal data are inadequate for quantitative predictions. UNCLASSIFIED SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfVWion D(K« Entered)