2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive accuracy of the breast cancer genetic risk model based on eight common genetic variants: The BACkSIDE study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the prior published meta-analyses, [22,23] we excluded 2 studies on rs3817198 (A > G) [42,43] and 3 articles lacking gene frequencies [70–72] and included 8 new publications. [24–29,51,53] Our findings were consistent with Jianzhou Tang et al [23] ; because of limitations in the inclusion of studies, Min-Bin Chen et al did not conduct a discussion on Asian populations. [22] Our study showed that rs3817198(T > C) could increase the susceptibility to breast carcinoma for persons with variations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2, congruent with the outcomes of Min-Bin Chen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the prior published meta-analyses, [22,23] we excluded 2 studies on rs3817198 (A > G) [42,43] and 3 articles lacking gene frequencies [70–72] and included 8 new publications. [24–29,51,53] Our findings were consistent with Jianzhou Tang et al [23] ; because of limitations in the inclusion of studies, Min-Bin Chen et al did not conduct a discussion on Asian populations. [22] Our study showed that rs3817198(T > C) could increase the susceptibility to breast carcinoma for persons with variations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2, congruent with the outcomes of Min-Bin Chen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[73] Our conclusions are more accurate than previous meta-analyses because we excluded some studies rs3817198(A > G) [42][43][44] and studies with incomplete gene frequencies [70,72,74] and included some newly published studies. [24][25][26]28,29,47,53,54] Our study had low heterogeneity, and we performed Metaregression to investigate the reasons for the heterogeneity. Metaregression did not yield significant sources of heterogeneity, with all P values > .05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with other risk assessment models, our PRS model shows higher AUC and detection efficiency in Han Chinese population [44][45][46]. rs3760982-A has the highest coefficients in the model, which locate in the 1.1 kb upstream of KCNN4 genes on chromosome 19q13.31 and has the highest allele frequency(0.86) among LVs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%