2019
DOI: 10.1159/000500459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Capabilities of Three Widely Used Pathology Classification Systems and a Simplified Classification (Beijing Classification) in Primary IgA Nephropathy

Abstract: Background/Aims: Several pathological classification systems were commonly used in clinical practice to predict the prognosis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). However, how prognostic value differs between these systems is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the Lee grade, the Oxford classification, and the Haas classification and to find a simplified classification. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed IgAN cases diagnosed between January 2002 and December 2007. The endpoints were progression to end-stage … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4] The Oxford group recognized that even lower reproducibility could be expected in routine practice without the advantage of the iterative processes of the working group. 1 This was confirmed by two large studies 15,23 with independent observers and lower reliability statistics than the others, 19,21,24,25 which were considered less representative of everyday application of the classification (Table 1). In these two, 15,23 agreement was moderate for T, moderate or poor for M and S, and poor for E and C. The Oxford group gave its view: "We conclude that differences in the scoring of MEST-C criteria between local pathologists and a central reviewer have a significant impact on the prognostic value of the Oxford classification."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…[1][2][3][4] The Oxford group recognized that even lower reproducibility could be expected in routine practice without the advantage of the iterative processes of the working group. 1 This was confirmed by two large studies 15,23 with independent observers and lower reliability statistics than the others, 19,21,24,25 which were considered less representative of everyday application of the classification (Table 1). In these two, 15,23 agreement was moderate for T, moderate or poor for M and S, and poor for E and C. The Oxford group gave its view: "We conclude that differences in the scoring of MEST-C criteria between local pathologists and a central reviewer have a significant impact on the prognostic value of the Oxford classification."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In 1982, Lee et al sorted IgAN patients into the grades 1 through 5 of pathological damage (i.e., mesangial cell proliferation, glomerulosclerosis, C formation, and tubulointerstitial alteration) [ 3 ]; the higher the grade of IgAN, the more severe the disease is and the shorter the survival is. Because Lee’s grading for IgAN is simple and easy to operate, it is useful in guiding treatment choices and predicting clinical outcomes [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. However, this classification has some shortcomings, mainly lacking an objective evaluation of pathological manifestations [ 7 ], which may lead to a biased prediction of prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A renal biopsy was performed when laboratory and clinical data predicted the possibility of significant nephritis and the need for additional treatment, especially immunosuppressive therapy. The histopathology in all three patients showed IgA glomerulonephritis grade III according to Haas, grade III according to Lee, and M1E1S0T0 according to the Oxford classification (11). One of the patients, an active athlete, refused renal biopsy and immunosuppressive treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%