Predictive capacity of pain beliefs and catastrophizing in Whiplash Associated Disorder

Bostick, Geoff P.; Carroll, Linda; Brown, Cary A.; Harley, Dwight; Gross, Douglas P.

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.007

Cited by 25 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One study reported a moderate value of the regression coefficient (β=2.16, p<0.001),61 based on the analysis of the helplessness dimension of the PCS. However, most of the coefficients were small (B=0.12 p≤0.0162; B (95% CI)=0.08 (0.01 to 0.16) p<0.0559; OR (95% CI)=0.885 (0.814 to 0.962) p=0.00460; AUC (95% CI)=0.78 (0.67–0.88) p<0.0556).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…After removing the duplicates, 945 titles and abstracts were screened with 397 full-text articles and then evaluated. Of these, 14 longitudinal studies describing 12 independent cohorts with a total of 2733 participants with WAD satisfied our inclusion criteria and were included in this review 34 36 38 52–62. The number of studies retrieved from each database and the number of studies excluded in each screening phase are shown in figure 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five studies examined this issue 36 38 52 58 59. Three studies showed that higher levels of pain catastrophising at baseline were associated with the progression and maintenance of pain intensity at 3,59 638 59 and 12 months,58 with a small value of the regression coefficient of β=0.08 p=0.0138; OR (95% CI)=1.14 (1.10 to 1.18) p<0.00058; β (95% CI)=0.09 (0.03 to 0.16) p<0.05 (3 months)59; β (95% CI)=0.10 (0.0 to 0.18) p<0.05 (6 months) 59…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of eight studies34 36 56 57 59–62 evaluated this topic. Higher levels of pain catastrophising at baseline were associated with the progression and maintenance of disability at 3,59 6,56 1261 and 24 months,62 while one study was associated with the opposite at 6 months 6061 based on the analysis of the helplessness dimension of the PCS.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Is kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising at baseline associated with chronic pain and disability in whiplash-associated disorders? A systematic review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundKinesiophobia and pain catastrophising may be associated with patients’ transition from having acute to chronic pain following a whiplash injury.ObjectiveTo systematically review and critically appraise the literature to determine whether kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising are associated with greater likelihood of patients developing chronic pain and disability following a whiplash injury.DesignA systematic review of the literatureData sourcesElectronic searches of PubMed, AMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PubPsych, and grey literature were undertaken from inception to September 2017.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudy selection was based on longitudinal studies evaluating how kinesiophobia and/or pain catastrophising at baseline are associated with pain intensity, disability or both after a whiplash injury.ResultsWe included 14 longitudinal studies that described 12 independent cohorts with a total sample of 2733 participants with whiplash-associated disorder. Kinesiophobia at baseline was not associated with pain intensity over time (three studies). Whether kinesiophobia at baseline was associated with disability was unclear as results were conflicting (six studies). There were also conflicting results when we examined the association between pain catastrophising and both pain intensity (five studies) and disability (eight studies).Summary/conclusionsKinesiophobia at baseline was not associated with pain intensity over time. There were conflicting results for the remaining analyses. The size of the associations was small. The overall quality of the evidence was very low.Trial registration numberCRD42016053864.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Is kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising at baseline associated with chronic pain and disability in whiplash-associated disorders? A systematic review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The decision algorithm, establishing the level of evidence across SRs, is a novel addition to the existing pool of literature, and should serve as a solid start point for new research in the area. More recently, evidence has largely continued to support the value of acute post-traumatic stress reactions [46], catastrophizing or pain-related beliefs [47], quantitative sensory testing [48] and expectation [49] as predictors of outcome. Efforts have been made to construct standardized risk screening tools [50] or to identify biological correlates of neck pain [51], each of which are in their infancy but have shown early promise in furthering this field.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Overview of Systematic Reviews on Prognostic Factors in Neck Pain: Results from the International Collaboration on Neck Pain (ICON) Project

Walton

Carroll²,

Kasch³

et al. 2013

TOORTHJ

118

138

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Given the challenges of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability, establishing a clear prognosis in the acute stage has become increasingly recognized as a valuable approach to mitigate chronic problems. Neck pain represents a condition that is common, potentially disabling, and has a high rate of transition to chronic or persistent problems. As a field of research, prognosis in neck pain has stimulated several empirical primary research papers, and a number of systematic reviews. As part of the International Consensus on Neck (ICON) project, we sought to establish the general state of knowledge in the area through a structured, systematic review of systematic reviews (overview).An exhaustive search strategy was created and employed to identify the 13 systematic reviews (SRs) that served as the primary data sources for this overview. A decision algorithm for data synthesis, which incorporated currency of the SR, risk of bias assessment of the SRs using AMSTAR scoring and consistency of findings across SRs, determined the level of confidence in the risk profile of 133 different variables. The results provide high confidence that baseline neck pain intensity and baseline disability have a strong association with outcome, while angular deformities of the neck and parameters of the initiating trauma have no effect on outcome. A vast number of predictors provide low or very low confidence or inconclusive results, suggesting there is still much work to be done in this field. Despite the presence of multiple SR and this overview, there is insufficient evidence to make firm conclusions on many potential prognostic variables. This study demonstrates the challenges in conducting overviews on prognosis where clear synthesis critieria and a lack of specifics of primary data in SR are barriers.

show abstract

Role of Patient Beliefs and Expectations in Pain and Disability

Garg

Sachdeva

2019

Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Predictive capacity of pain beliefs and catastrophizing in Whiplash Associated Disorder

Cited by 25 publications

References 43 publications

Is kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising at baseline associated with chronic pain and disability in whiplash-associated disorders? A systematic review

Is kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising at baseline associated with chronic pain and disability in whiplash-associated disorders? A systematic review

An Overview of Systematic Reviews on Prognostic Factors in Neck Pain: Results from the International Collaboration on Neck Pain (ICON) Project

Role of Patient Beliefs and Expectations in Pain and Disability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About