2022
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2022.2041624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Data-Driven Model Based on Generative Adversarial Network for Premixed Turbulence-Combustion Regimes

Abstract: Premixed flames exhibit different asymptotic regimes of interaction between heat release and turbulence depending on their respective length scales. At high Karlovitz number, the dilatation caused by heat release does not have any relevant effect on turbulent kinetic energy with respect to non-reacting flow, while at low Karlovitz number, the mean shear is a sink of turbulent kinetic energy, and counter-gradient transport is observed. This latter phenomenon is not well captured by closure models commonly used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this approach, the authors were able to match the energy and scalar spectra of homogeneous isotropic turbulence DNS nearly perfectly and demonstrated the model's ability to work in an aposteriori context. However, ML-based approaches might perform poorly when applied to configurations substantially different from those they were trained on, as data from different regimes is usually absent from the training dataset and the prediction of the networks are entirely data-driven [16]. This might cause convergence issues in a-posteriori applications, as suggested by Lapeyre et al [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this approach, the authors were able to match the energy and scalar spectra of homogeneous isotropic turbulence DNS nearly perfectly and demonstrated the model's ability to work in an aposteriori context. However, ML-based approaches might perform poorly when applied to configurations substantially different from those they were trained on, as data from different regimes is usually absent from the training dataset and the prediction of the networks are entirely data-driven [16]. This might cause convergence issues in a-posteriori applications, as suggested by Lapeyre et al [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%