2022
DOI: 10.1037/tps0000293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive effects of creative abilities and attitudes on performance in university-level computer science courses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The order of presentation for surveys and cognitive tasks was counterbalanced in each study. Five of the six datasets have been used previously in published works ( Table 1 ; Cortes et al 2022 ; Daker et al 2022b ; Lyons et al 2018 ; Daker et al 2022a ). All analyses presented here are novel and address hypotheses specific to this current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The order of presentation for surveys and cognitive tasks was counterbalanced in each study. Five of the six datasets have been used previously in published works ( Table 1 ; Cortes et al 2022 ; Daker et al 2022b ; Lyons et al 2018 ; Daker et al 2022a ). All analyses presented here are novel and address hypotheses specific to this current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants completed an online battery to collect both spatial and general anxiety measures and MRT performance. More detailed information on the experimental procedures for this study can be found in Daker et al ( 2022a ). Study procedures were approved by the Georgetown University IRB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head-motion parameters with respect to the BOLD reference (transformation matrices, and six corresponding rotation and translation parameters) are estimated before any spatiotemporal filtering using FSL (Jenkinson et al, 2002). BOLD runs were slice-time corrected using Analysis of Functional NeuroImages (AFNI; Cox & Hyde, 1997). The BOLD time series were then resampled into Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space using ANTs.…”
Section: Functional Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to artistic creativity, scientific creativity has been substantially understudied, potentially due in part to popular associations of science with technical modes of thinking rather than with creativity, which is more commonly associated with arts. Yet creativity is critical for success in scientific domains, such as generating novel hypotheses, flexibly connecting information from diverse sources, and solving ill-defined problems (Daker et al, 2022). Psychologists have studied some aspects of scientific creativity, such as behavioral correlates of scientific productivity (e.g., intelligence, personality; Barron & Harrington, 1981; Sternberg et al, 2020) and cognitive processes relevant for scientific thinking (e.g., analogical reasoning, hypothesis generation; Sak & Ayas, 2013; Sanchez-Ruiz et al, 2013).…”
Section: Scientific Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make students use what they have learned to express their feelings and understanding of art, and thus form individual works of art, it is necessary to make students interested in the study of art. Therefore, in the process of art education in middle schools, teachers can use the unique aesthetic feeling presented by art works to fully mobilize students' interest in art learning, stimulate their intrinsic motivation of expression, guide them to boldly carry out creation, thinking and practice centered on their own interests, and express their understanding of art, thus improving their art quality [13].…”
Section: Stimulate Students' Interest In Art Study and Cultivate Thei...mentioning
confidence: 99%