2022
DOI: 10.1532/hsf.4899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Efficacy of the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance for Acute Allograft Rejection and Cardiac Events After Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Background: In patients treated by heart transplantation, the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) has been found to have predictive potential for subsequent acute allograft rejection (AAR) and long-time cardiac events. When consulting related literature, the studies mostly were single-center with small sample sizes. The question of whether IMR can be utilized as a predictive biomarker is becoming increasingly contentious. To confirm the predictive efficacy of IMR, researchers did a systematic review and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical picture varies from asymptomatic with findings on endomyocardial biopsy to cardiogenic shock. Studies show that patients with microcirculatory resistance index [65], donors with macrophages with activated C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) and myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 (MYDD8) [66], increased left ventricle posterior wall thickness (1 mm increases 66%) and increased left ventricle mass index (1 g/m 2 , the chance increases 2.7%) [66,67], have an increased chance of rejection. Three types of rejection have been identified, which are described below.…”
Section: Complications 61 Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%

Heart Transplantation

Chrysakis,
Magouliotis,
Spiliopoulos
et al. 2024
JCM
“…The clinical picture varies from asymptomatic with findings on endomyocardial biopsy to cardiogenic shock. Studies show that patients with microcirculatory resistance index [65], donors with macrophages with activated C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) and myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 (MYDD8) [66], increased left ventricle posterior wall thickness (1 mm increases 66%) and increased left ventricle mass index (1 g/m 2 , the chance increases 2.7%) [66,67], have an increased chance of rejection. Three types of rejection have been identified, which are described below.…”
Section: Complications 61 Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%

Heart Transplantation

Chrysakis,
Magouliotis,
Spiliopoulos
et al. 2024
JCM
“…In the multivariate analysis, only baseline IMR ≥ 16.0 was independently associated with AAR during the first year, demonstrating a high negative predictive value (96.7%). Moreover, in the meta-analysis, including 616 patients from five trials, the authors assessed the predictive potential of IMR for subsequent AAR and long-time cardiac events [35]. Both the risk of AAR (RR: 4.08; 95% CI: 2.69-6.17; p < 0.001) and long-term cardiac events (RR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.44-3.19; p < 0.001) was significantly higher in IMR-high compared to IMR-low group.…”
Section: Coronary Microcirculation Disease In Patients After Heart Tr...mentioning
confidence: 99%