Purpose
The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE) and adjustment rules after severe toxicity are derived by consensus, but little is known about the determinants of toxicity recurrence, especially in the elderly.
Patients and Methods
We prospectively accrued 200 patients (≥65 years) prior to chemotherapy. For those with grade 3–4 non-hematologic or grade 4 hematologic toxicity (severe toxicity), we recorded duration and functional impact, treatment modifications, and severe toxicity recurrence. The regimen’s toxicity was adjusted with the MAX2 index.
Results
Median patient age was 73 years(range 65–90). Among 163 patients evaluable for toxicity after ≥1 treatment cycle (receiving on average 4.73 cycles), 82 had severe toxicity, 10 were discontinued for toxicity, 6 for other reasons, and 5 died. Sixty-one patients had further chemotherapy, 41 without dose modification (16 with secondary prevention measures) and 20 with dose modifications. Without modification, 19(46%) had a recurrence (0 death). With modification, 7(35%) had a recurrence (1 death). In univariate analysis, treatment intent, hospitalization, and duration-adjusted Activities of Daily Living (ADL), quality of life impact, and fatigue were associated with dose modification. ADL remained associated in multivariate analysis(p=0.02). In univariate analysis for toxicity recurrence, ECOG PS and MAX2 score showed an association, with only the latter remaining significant in multivariate analysis(p=0.04).
Conclusions
If a severe toxicity does not have a long ADL impact, oncologists are less inclined to modify treatment. With proper supportive measures, this leads to recurrence risks similar to those shown in patients with modified treatment, with low risks of toxic deaths overall.