2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinical Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
77
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
77
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are other parameters and tumour characteristics that increase the risk of mediastinal nodal involvement, especially when combining them. This is the situation of adenocarcinoma histological type, combined with tumour size, FDG uptake value or serum CEA level (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are other parameters and tumour characteristics that increase the risk of mediastinal nodal involvement, especially when combining them. This is the situation of adenocarcinoma histological type, combined with tumour size, FDG uptake value or serum CEA level (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors, as mentioned above (7,8), have encountered a high SUVmax value as a predictor of mediastinal metastases in combination with other factors, but also higher uptake values have been associated with worse survival and increased risk of recurrence in patients with stage I NSCLC (10). The main limitation of these studies is that not all of them report a multivariate analysis of the different prognostic factors, the difficulty to standardize the PET uptake values and to define a prognostic SUV cut-off, which leads to confusion when comparing studies (11).…”
Section: Controversies On Lung Cancer: Pros and Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the GGO status can predict LNM more accurately than the tumor diameter, [11] we believe decisions on whether to perform mediastinal lymphadenectomy should not be based purely on the tumor size.…”
Section: Although 2009 Guidelines Of the Internationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, although the number of cases needed to treat in cIA to obtain a benefit from invasive staging is too high, some subgroups with an increased risk may benefit. As we commented in our previous manuscript, some authors have detected that, in cIA tumours, the combination of tumour characteristics (histological type, consolidation/tumour ratio, tumour size, SUVmax value) and other clinical parameters (serum CEA level, patient's age) have an increased risk of mediastinal involvement (33.8%) (5,6). For this reason, invasive mediastinal staging should have a role in patients with one or a combination of the above-mentioned parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%