“…[2,7,8] Treatment within 24 hours of rupture termed ultra-early treatment has been associated with reduced mortality and a reduced likelihood of a poor neurological outcome[8] however a meta-analysis [9] and a recent large propensity-matched study [10] have cast doubt on whether treatment timing alone is associated with a bene t. This ambiguity together with the increased cost and logistical burden [11][12][13] has placed a renewed emphasis on accurate re-bleed prediction. Location, [7,14] size, [1,2,7,[14][15][16][17] morphology, [16,18,19] clinical grade, [7,15,16,20,21] radiological grade, [2,6,16,21] hypertension, [7,14,16,18] systolic blood pressure over 160mmHg, [21] hydrocephalus, [2,6,14] pre-treatment external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion, [13] intracerebral haematoma (ICH) [14] and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) at diagnosis [7] have been associated with pre-treatment re-bleeding. A number of clinical prediction models have been recently described incorporating these and other time-independent factors.…”