2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Factors of Headache Resolution After Chiari Type 1 Malformation Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 4 CCOS domains were each dichotomized into favorable (score of 3 or 4) or unfavorable (score of 1 or 2) outcome, and a favorable overall outcome was defined as a total CCOS score ranging from 13 to 16, as has been described previously. 4,11 Since depression may affect outcome in any 1 of the 4 CCOS domains, univariable analysis was performed to evaluate potential associations between baseline variables and any of the 4 CCOS domains as well as the composite CCOS score. Since the CSI already includes several key clinical variables such as headache and myelopathy symptoms, clinical symptoms were only included in the analysis if they differed significantly between depressed and nondepressed patients (possible confounders).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4 CCOS domains were each dichotomized into favorable (score of 3 or 4) or unfavorable (score of 1 or 2) outcome, and a favorable overall outcome was defined as a total CCOS score ranging from 13 to 16, as has been described previously. 4,11 Since depression may affect outcome in any 1 of the 4 CCOS domains, univariable analysis was performed to evaluate potential associations between baseline variables and any of the 4 CCOS domains as well as the composite CCOS score. Since the CSI already includes several key clinical variables such as headache and myelopathy symptoms, clinical symptoms were only included in the analysis if they differed significantly between depressed and nondepressed patients (possible confounders).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the calculation is complicated and often requires professional software, which limits its clinical application. The volumes of different structures in the skull cavity, including the intracranial volume, PCF volume, supratentorial volume, herniated volume, 4th ventricle volume, and hindbrain volume, have been measured, [4,5,8] but the volumetric measurements failed to predict the response of CMI patients to PFD. As the brain tissue on either side of the median sagittal plane approximates a mirror-symmetric distribution, relevant areas in the median sagittal plane of the PCF are commonly used as morphological parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3] The exact prevalence of CMI in the general population is unclear but, according to one report, the prevalence ranges from 0.5% to 0.9% in adults and is ∼1% in children. [4] The symptoms and signs of CMI reflect the obstruction of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow, compression of the contents in the posterior cranial fossa (PCF), or spinal cord dysfunction. [5] Surgery is the only way to treat CMI, and posterior fossa decompression (PFD) is the standard procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Grangeon et al tested the CSI on 38 adult CM-I patients; the proportion of improved patients (CCOS ≥ 13) decreased with increasing CSI, but results were not statistically significant, similar to the results of our study. 9 This weak association between CSI and outcomes in the adult population may be the result of important differences between adult and pediatric CM-I. A study by Gilmer at al.…”
Section: The Chiari Severity Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%