2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive inferences are represented as hypothetical facts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Validation is also likely to play a major role for such predictive processes, because predictions can fail and readers need to detect prediction failures to construct a coherent and adequate representation of the text content. Predictions rely on forming representations of hypothetical facts (Campion, 2004). Validation might be the process whereby these hypotheses are tested.…”
Section: Knowledge Activation Integration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation is also likely to play a major role for such predictive processes, because predictions can fail and readers need to detect prediction failures to construct a coherent and adequate representation of the text content. Predictions rely on forming representations of hypothetical facts (Campion, 2004). Validation might be the process whereby these hypotheses are tested.…”
Section: Knowledge Activation Integration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inden for rammerne af distinktionen baglaens og forlaens inferenser har man defineret forventninger som det at laesere på grundlag af den situation der beskrives, infererer hvilken begivenhed der efterfølgende vil foregå (Mckoon & Ratcliff 1986, Keefe & McDaniel 1993, Klin et al 1999, Campion 2004. Ud fra denne opfattelse er forventninger en forståelsesaktivitet der relaterer sig til det beskrevne begivenhedsforløb og beror på laeserens kausale viden om almindelige begivenhedsforløb.…”
Section: Den Kausalt Orienterede Tilgang: Forventninger Som Unødvendiunclassified
“…Such facts are then integrated into the mental representation of the text, stored in long-term memory, and reactivated later under suitable conditions. In contrast, predictive inferences may never be confirmed by subsequent sentences and remain hypothetical (Campion, 2004). Consequently, the integration of predictive inferences with text representation should be different from the integration of bridging inferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%