Predictive Landscape Portrayals: A Selective Research Review

Abstract

holds an M.A. (Oxon, England) in Agricultural and Forest Sciences and an M.S. in Forestry, and has studied Landscape Architecture at the University of British Columbia and the University of California, Berkeley. He has carried out landscape analysis studies for Canadian and American resource agencies and, as a consultant, has prepared simulations for a range of land use developments. He has conducted research and lectures on visual analysis, Bureau of Land Management visual assessment procedures, and computer graphics, and is currently completing a Ph.D. at Berkeley on the use and validity of landscape portrayals in planning.Abstract: Landscape portrayals are widely used to simulate the appearance in perspective of proposed modifications to the landscape. This paper reviews some simulation-related research which may contribute to an analytical framework for creating and validating landscape portrayals. A number of criteria for evaluating simulations are drawn from two important approaches. The first is to analyze people's responses-that is, the equivalence of responses to simulations with responses to reality. The second is to analyze the simulation image--the accuracy with which a portrayal replicates actual visual properties. Various studies have examined simulation validity by using several response dimensions, and have found both high and low response equivalence. Relatively few studies have attempted to appraise image properties, although methods of doing this appear to be available. Sources of inaccuracy and the poor representativeness of portrayals are postulated as threats to simulation validity. Research directions of practical significance are suggested by the potential benefits of relating image properties to responses," this is the crucial step towards estimating the validity of landscape portrayals before the depicted development is constructed.Landscape Journal ]4Landscape Journal

Affective and Restorative Valences for Three Environmental Categories

“…This procedure ensured the selection of appropriate landscape slides that did not have serious photo irregularities or distortion of colors or shapes ( Han, 2010 ). Three landscape architects evaluated the photographs for content (representation validity; Sheppard, 1982 ). Evaluations of environmental design (beauty and harmony) for each environmental category were obtained (scale of 1-5, where 1 was the lowest score on environmental design and 5 was the highest).…”