2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive mapping of soil total nitrogen at a regional scale: A comparison between geographically weighted regression and cokriging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
70
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The co-kriging method (Dirks, 1998;Goovaerts, 1999;Wang et al, 2013) was applied with 0.1 precision intervals (quartiles) and two variables: botanic marks and digital elevation model with a resolution of 1 × 1 m.…”
Section: Statistical and Spatial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The co-kriging method (Dirks, 1998;Goovaerts, 1999;Wang et al, 2013) was applied with 0.1 precision intervals (quartiles) and two variables: botanic marks and digital elevation model with a resolution of 1 × 1 m.…”
Section: Statistical and Spatial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial dependence of soil is accounted for by using the distance decay function. Many applications of GWR have shown good results for spatial non-stationarity modeling of soil variation (Mishra and Riley, 2012;Song et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2011). However, the relationships between soil and some environmental covariates may be constant, not always varying as modeled in GWR in a given study area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpolation results are best when the data are normally distributed for kriging and co-kriging. Wang et al (2013) found that N values interpolated by ordinary kriging perform well. The drawback to ordinary kriging is that it causes smoothing effects and has some difficulty dealing with co-variables.…”
Section: Soil Datamentioning
confidence: 92%