2021
DOI: 10.1002/2688-8319.12064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive mapping to identify refuges for plant communities threatened by earthworm invasion

Abstract: 1. Biological invasions by cryptic ecosystem engineers can alter the ecological and socio-economic values of ecosystems in ways that may take decades to detect.The invasion of North American glacial refuges by non-native earthworms offers a prominent but understudied example of a cryptic invasion. Non-native earthworms are known to alter carbon sequestration, disrupt mycorrhizal networks and homogenize plant communities, but natural resource managers still lack robust protocols to identify and safeguard high c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 85 , 95 For a more comprehensive approach, and also to avoid any potential confounding effects between the physical distance between areas and the earthworm invasion status, we suggest further studies to cover larger areas in several forests by setting up several clusters of plots, widely separated, inside each of these areas, as for example performed in Fleri and Arcese. 96 Moreover, controlled field experiments on invasive earthworm effects might be a promising approach to investigate causal relationships. 97 We thus stress the need for standardized comparisons of invasive earthworm effects on plant (functional) diversity between multiple forests over time, 98 to be able to gain further insights into the mechanisms that underpin the temporal dynamics of invasive earthworm effects on plant communities and ecosystem functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 85 , 95 For a more comprehensive approach, and also to avoid any potential confounding effects between the physical distance between areas and the earthworm invasion status, we suggest further studies to cover larger areas in several forests by setting up several clusters of plots, widely separated, inside each of these areas, as for example performed in Fleri and Arcese. 96 Moreover, controlled field experiments on invasive earthworm effects might be a promising approach to investigate causal relationships. 97 We thus stress the need for standardized comparisons of invasive earthworm effects on plant (functional) diversity between multiple forests over time, 98 to be able to gain further insights into the mechanisms that underpin the temporal dynamics of invasive earthworm effects on plant communities and ecosystem functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, upslope locations were consistently closer to potential sources of invasion, such as trails, roads, and homes, corroborating previous observations that earthworm invasions are frequently facilitated by human activity and development (Suárez, Tierney, et al ., 2006; Paudel et al ., 2016; Bellitürk et al ., 2015). Asplenium scolopendrium is also associated with rocky and steep terrain, and thus might be less vulnerable to earthworm invasions and subsequent impacts, as earthworms are less abundant and more likely to be absent from areas with shallower soil and steeper slopes (Fleri and Arcese, 2021; Suárez, Tierney, et al ., 2006). However, earthworms can be carried downslope to A. scolopendrium populations and ravine bottoms by water, especially during storm events, suggesting ferns might experience episodic earthworm dispersal events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These annual species are surface dwellers (epi-endogeic), reproduce parthenogenetically with overwintering cocoons, exhibit rapid growth rates and flexible diets, allowing rapid population increases (Moore, Görres, and Reynolds, 2018; Zhang et al ., 2010). Establishment and dispersal of invasive worms is influenced by abiotic factors such as moisture and slope (Fleri and Arcese, 2021), but also by human activities (fishing bait and gardening) and local proximity to human development, especially to roads and garden refuse (Suárez, Tierney, et al ., 2006; Bellitürk et al ., 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%