2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01859-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive model for the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Background To date, multiple predictive models have been developed with the goal of reliably differentiating between solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) that are malignant and those that are benign. The present meta-analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic utility of these predictive models in the context of SPN differential diagnosis. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched for relevant stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic utility of individual CT features is relatively limited when evaluating PNs. In prior meta-analyses assessing the diagnostic performance of lobulation sign, calcification, and spiculation as approaches to differential diagnosis of PNs, the AUC values were between 0.65 and 0.76 [ 1 3 ]. The AUC for the diagnostic utility of PET alone in the present study was 0.82, but the pooled specificity was just 51%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The diagnostic utility of individual CT features is relatively limited when evaluating PNs. In prior meta-analyses assessing the diagnostic performance of lobulation sign, calcification, and spiculation as approaches to differential diagnosis of PNs, the AUC values were between 0.65 and 0.76 [ 1 3 ]. The AUC for the diagnostic utility of PET alone in the present study was 0.82, but the pooled specificity was just 51%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A given predictive model was considered to exhibit high diagnostic performance if it exhibited an NLR < 0.2 or a PLR > 5. An area under the SROC curve (AUC) value greater than 0.8 was also considered to indicate a high degree of diagnostic utility [ 3 ]. RevMan v 5.3 was used to compare pooled SUV max values between benign and malignant PNs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Efforts to distinguish between SPNs that are likely to be benign and those likely to be malignant are generally centered on the clinical data, computed tomography (CT) ndings, and tumor marker levels for each patient [8][9][10]. There have been many efforts to establish predictive models capable of assessing SPN malignancy risk by combining several predictors associated with malignant nodules [9], yielding models with sensitivities from 84%-91% and speci cities from 74%-80%, together with area under the curve (AUC) values from 0.83-0.89 [9]. There is thus a clear opportunity to develop even more accurate predictive models for SPN assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the wide application of low-dose multislice spiral computed tomography (CT) and the increase of the number of physical examinations, the detection rate of pulmonary nodules is increasing ( 3 ). About 1% of pulmonary nodules are malignant tumors, most of which are lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) ( 4 ). The management of LUAD with different invasiveness degrees is different: for pre-invasive lung nodules with slow growth rate, only regular follow-up is required, whereas invasive lung nodules require elective or immediate surgical treatment ( 5 , 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%