2016
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i4/87032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Modeling of Student Dropout Indicators in Educational Data Mining using Improved Decision Tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
44
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Sivakumar et al [ 31 ] proposed to use Renyi entropy to replace the information entropy in the Gain heuristic. Moreover, the normalisation factor, V ( k ), was used to improve the Gain instability, thereby improving the performance of the decision tree.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sivakumar et al [ 31 ] proposed to use Renyi entropy to replace the information entropy in the Gain heuristic. Moreover, the normalisation factor, V ( k ), was used to improve the Gain instability, thereby improving the performance of the decision tree.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Con el uso de distintos paquetes de software para ejecutar los algoritmos de análisis, encontraron un 90% de precisión en la predicción de la aprobación de las asignaturas. En un estudio más reciente, Sivakumar et al (2016), al igual que Pal (2012), propusieron un algoritmo de decisión para predecir la tasa de deserción de estudiantes universitarios en India. Para ello utilizaron una muestra de 240 estudiantes y consideraron 32 potenciales atributos que podrían influir en la decisión de desertar.…”
Section: Ramírezunclassified
“…References Adjustment [12] Age [4], [5], [8], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31] Change of goal [12], [32] Choice to change to current major [24] Country or city of origin [13], [26], [33] Domicile [12], [16], [17], [18], [30], [34] Encouragement and support of parents [27] Engagement of student [5], [35], [36] Engagement of student [5], [35] Ethnicity [4], [13], [16], [17], [21], [22], [24], [25], [27], [28]...…”
Section: Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%