2019
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive multi‐scale occupancy models at range‐wide extents: Effects of habitat and human disturbance on distributions of wetland birds

Abstract: Aim: Predicting distributions is fundamental to ecology, yet hindered by spatially restricted sampling, scale-dependent relationships and detection error associated with field surveys. Predictive species distribution models (SDMs) are nonetheless vital for conservation of many species. We developed a framework for building predictive SDMs with multi-scale data and used it to develop range-wide breeding-season SDMs for 14 marsh bird species of concern. Location: USA. Methods:We built SDMs using data from range-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous research, we predicted that occupancy of marsh‐breeding bird species would be positively associated with marsh cover and negatively associated with urban, agricultural, and forest cover (Tozer et al 2010, Quesnelle et al 2013, Tozer 2016, Panci et al 2017, Saunders et al 2019). We also predicted that species would be associated with landscape features at a variety of different scales (Stevens and Conway 2020), and that the majority of the new additional priority areas based on marsh‐breeding birds would fall outside existing priority areas based on waterfowl (Prairie Habitat Joint Venture 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous research, we predicted that occupancy of marsh‐breeding bird species would be positively associated with marsh cover and negatively associated with urban, agricultural, and forest cover (Tozer et al 2010, Quesnelle et al 2013, Tozer 2016, Panci et al 2017, Saunders et al 2019). We also predicted that species would be associated with landscape features at a variety of different scales (Stevens and Conway 2020), and that the majority of the new additional priority areas based on marsh‐breeding birds would fall outside existing priority areas based on waterfowl (Prairie Habitat Joint Venture 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used raster regression to build spatially‐explicit models that predict breeding habitat quality. Predictions were generated from multiscale hierarchical occupancy models built using field data collected over a 14‐year period across the U.S. (Stevens & Conway, , ). We used the optimally predictive model for each species to predict occupancy probability as a function of rasters that measured habitat and disturbance covariates over a variety of spatial extents via moving‐window analyses (see Appendix A for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also considered anthropogenic disturbances (agriculture, development, and modification of hydrology) at broader extents within a watershed, which were important for some species (Tables A1 and A2). Both the specific covariates and the spatial extents at which each covariate was measured were species‐specific and optimized for out‐of‐sample spatial prediction (i.e., to predict at new locations in space; Stevens & Conway, , ). These analyses allowed for fine‐resolution (30 m) prediction of habitat quality for each species based on ecological effects of habitat and disturbance variables that could operate over a range of spatial extents that are relevant to these birds (Glisson, Conway, Nadeau, & Borgmann, ; Stevens & Conway, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations