2023
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.6572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive output feedback control of networked control system with Markov DoS attack and time delay

Abstract: Summary This paper studies the networked control systems (NCS) predictive output feedback control issue with random time delay and denial of service (DoS) attacks. The mathematical description of the random DoS attacks and time delays in controller‐to‐actuator (C‐A) and sensor‐to‐controller (S‐C) communication channels is researched based on Markov stochastic theory. Considering the random characteristics of network‐induced attacks and delays, the closed‐loop NCS is modeled as a discrete‐time linear system wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The full‐state feedback multi‐loop controller was used to solve the system nonlinearities and parameter dependence problems by incorporating a combination of active damping and a disturbance observer (DOB), 3 which is an advanced solution to the flatness‐technique‐based feedback linearization controller 2 . However, this recent development does not guarantee ideal performance during actual implementation owing to the uncertain time delays between the local agents and main controller, which can be alleviated by incorporating additional time‐delay compensation mechanisms (as in References 8–10) in the main control loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full‐state feedback multi‐loop controller was used to solve the system nonlinearities and parameter dependence problems by incorporating a combination of active damping and a disturbance observer (DOB), 3 which is an advanced solution to the flatness‐technique‐based feedback linearization controller 2 . However, this recent development does not guarantee ideal performance during actual implementation owing to the uncertain time delays between the local agents and main controller, which can be alleviated by incorporating additional time‐delay compensation mechanisms (as in References 8–10) in the main control loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] At present, many scholars have carried out a lot of modeling, analysis and design work for networked control systems such as network-induced delay, packet loss and packet disorder. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Therefore, it is necessary to find more effectively methods to deal with these problems. In order to solve the problem of time delay caused by limited communication bandwidth resources, scholars have proposed two solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during the transmission of control signals, due to the limited network bandwidth, there are inevitably some problems in the networked control systems: time delay, packet loss, packet sequence disorder and so forth, which may degrade the performance of the system, or even seriously damage the stability of the system 12–14 . At present, many scholars have carried out a lot of modeling, analysis and design work for networked control systems such as network‐induced delay, packet loss and packet disorder 15–21 . Therefore, it is necessary to find more effectively methods to deal with these problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors in Reference 18 combined the event triggered mechanism and H$$ {H}_{\infty } $$ control approaches to solve the formation problems of multi‐area power systems subject to communication delays and bounded disturbances. In addition, several advanced control methodologies are also exploited to solve the robust consensus/formation problems, such as, disturbance observer‐based finite‐time formation control, 19,20 slide mode control, 21 model predictive control, 22,23 PID‐type method, 24 to name a few. However, the aforementioned studies share a common assumption that the nonlinear dynamics satisfy the Lipschitz conditions and the bounds of uncertainties are only limited to linearly depend on the states and bounded disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%