2017 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icde.2017.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Provisioning: Efficiently Anticipating Usage in Azure SQL Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Load Prediction for optimized resource allocation on a cluster has become a popular research direction in the recent years. Existing approaches focus on predicting survivability of databases for optimized resource provisioning [34], idle time detection for database quiescing and overbooking [27,39], database workload prediction for database consolidation [18], VM workload prediction [25] for oversubscribing servers [14], dynamic VM provisioning [13], and reducing performance interference between VMs co-located on the same physical machine [32], workload classification for capacity planning and task scheduling [31], cost-and QoS-aware application placement in virtualized server clusters [38,40], and preemptive auto-scale of resources [19,20,21,22,26,36,33,35,37,41]. None of these approaches focused on predicting low load windows for optimized scheduling of system maintenance tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Load Prediction for optimized resource allocation on a cluster has become a popular research direction in the recent years. Existing approaches focus on predicting survivability of databases for optimized resource provisioning [34], idle time detection for database quiescing and overbooking [27,39], database workload prediction for database consolidation [18], VM workload prediction [25] for oversubscribing servers [14], dynamic VM provisioning [13], and reducing performance interference between VMs co-located on the same physical machine [32], workload classification for capacity planning and task scheduling [31], cost-and QoS-aware application placement in virtualized server clusters [38,40], and preemptive auto-scale of resources [19,20,21,22,26,36,33,35,37,41]. None of these approaches focused on predicting low load windows for optimized scheduling of system maintenance tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and Rackspace Cloud Servers are the leading cloud service providers that aim to guarantee high quality of service to their customers, while controlling operating costs [28,39]. Achieving these conflicting goals manually is laborintensive, time-consuming, error-prone, neither scalable, nor durable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation