“…On one hand it would be able to capture the local-to-global properties of neural processes that give rise to timing, on the other hand it would allow to grasp the integration processes among brain regions responsible for timing by means of metastability of network states (Friston, 1997 ; Fingelkurts and Fingelkurts, 2004 , 2017 ; Deco and Kringelbach, 2016 ). Accordingly, our perspective view about the best strategy able to provide a coherent and complete description of timing can be divided in three steps: (1) the choice of tasks involving different aspects of timing (Coull and Nobre, 1998 , 2008 ; Coull, 2004 ; Coull et al, 2013 ; Ciullo et al, 2018a ) to be administered on a steady-state fashion (Gonzalez-Castillo and Bandettini, 2018 ; Tommasin et al, 2018 ) in order to saturate the activity of the areas interacting during the specific task; (2) the brain activity should be monitored by means of different techniques able to highlight different temporal and spatial scales (e.g., fMRI, hd-EEG, MEG). Specifically the different scales can be cast in a common framework according to the multilayer representation (De Domenico et al, 2013 ) (different spatial scales for the same time scale or different temporal scales for the same spatial one); (3) the temporal dynamics from each task will be finally analyzed and fitted to theoretical models of neuronal synchronization (Deco et al, 2017 ; Cavanna et al, 2018 ) in order to cluster the dynamics of brain's activity during time processing.…”