Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Camouflaged Object Detection

Zhang, Yi; Zhang, Jing; Hamidouche, Wassim; Déforges, Olivier

doi:10.1109/tip.2023.3287137

Cited by 20 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Secondly, the prediction results of individual ML algorithms are stochastic, resulting in low prediction robustness and generalization performance. Finally, all existing ML algorithms can only provide ρ d max point prediction results, and can not take into account the errors caused by the uncertainty issues [ 32 , 33 ] in the prediction process [ 34 , 35 ]. There must be a large deviation between the compaction quality assessment conclusions based on the ρ d max prediction results with errors and the real situation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Method for Full-Section Assessment of High-Speed Railway Subgrade Compaction Quality Based on ML-Interval Prediction Theory

Deng,

Wang,

et al. 2024

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality is controlled by the compaction degree (K), with the maximum dry density (ρdmax) serving as a crucial indicator for its calculation. The current mechanisms and methods for determining the ρdmax still suffer from uncertainties, inefficiencies, and lack of intelligence. These deficiencies can lead to insufficient assessments for the high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality, further impacting the operational safety of high-speed railways. In this paper, a novel method for full-section assessment of high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality based on ML-interval prediction theory is proposed. Firstly, based on indoor vibration compaction tests, a method for determining the ρdmax based on the dynamic stiffness Krb turning point is proposed. Secondly, the Pso-OptimalML-Adaboost (POA) model for predicting ρdmax is determined based on three typical machine learning (ML) algorithms, which are back propagation neural network (BPNN), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest (RF). Thirdly, the interval prediction theory is introduced to quantify the uncertainty in ρdmax prediction. Finally, based on the Bootstrap-POA-ANN interval prediction model and spatial interpolation algorithms, the interval distribution of ρdmax across the full-section can be determined, and a model for full-section assessment of compaction quality is developed based on the compaction standard (95%). Moreover, the proposed method is applied to determine the optimal compaction thicknesses (H0), within the station subgrade test section in the southwest region. The results indicate that: (1) The PSO-BPNN-AdaBoost model performs better in the accuracy and error metrics, which is selected as the POA model for predicting ρdmax. (2) The Bootstrap-POA-ANN interval prediction model for ρdmax can construct clear and reliable prediction intervals. (3) The model for full-section assessment of compaction quality can provide the full-section distribution interval for K. Comparing the H0 of 50~60 cm and 60~70 cm, the compaction quality is better with the H0 of 40~50 cm. The research findings can provide effective techniques for assessing the compaction quality of high-speed railway subgrades.

show abstract