1988
DOI: 10.1177/153450848801400106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Validity of DIAL-R

Abstract: The establishment of predictive validity and the calculation of sensitivity and specificity were described for the DIAL-R. These results were compared with the concurrent and predictive validity figures from other screening tests. Suggestions for avoiding common problems include obtaining optimal cut-off scores by using the contrasting group method or by developing local norms and calculating sensitivity and specificity on one's own population and adjusting the cut-off points until the “best fit” is obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a number of teachers listed the Hawaii Early Learning Profile (Vort Corporation, 1995) as an assessment they use, while oth-ers listed the HELP-both listings refer to the same instrument and were assigned the same code. Additionally, a number of teachers listed the DIAL (Mardell & Goldenburg, 1975), while others listed the DIAL-R (Mardell-Czudnowski & Goldenberg, 1990) or the DIAL-3 (Mardell-Czudnowski & Goldenburg, 1998), different editions of the same instrument (i.e., the Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning). Again, in these instances a single code was assigned to all response variations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a number of teachers listed the Hawaii Early Learning Profile (Vort Corporation, 1995) as an assessment they use, while oth-ers listed the HELP-both listings refer to the same instrument and were assigned the same code. Additionally, a number of teachers listed the DIAL (Mardell & Goldenburg, 1975), while others listed the DIAL-R (Mardell-Czudnowski & Goldenberg, 1990) or the DIAL-3 (Mardell-Czudnowski & Goldenburg, 1998), different editions of the same instrument (i.e., the Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning). Again, in these instances a single code was assigned to all response variations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DIAL-R is a standardized instrument that facilitates the identification of children at either end of the continuum of readiness skills who may need additional services (Mardell-Czudnowski & Goldenburg, 1983). This measure samples more than thirty separate behaviors that are representative of children from ages two through six and reports norms by age for motor, language, and concept development.…”
Section: Screening Of Preschoolersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most four-and five-year-olds in the 41 community were administered Dial-R, a standardized screening instrument that facilitates the identification of young children at either end of the continuum of readiness skills who may be in need of additional services (Mardell-Czudnowski & Goldenburg, 1983). This measure samples more than thirty separate behaviors representative of children from ages two through six and reports norms by age for motor, language, and concept development.…”
Section: Parent and Child Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%