Predictive Validity of the ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for Naturalistically Matched vs. Mismatched Alcoholism Patients

Abstract

This study examined the predictive validity of the ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for matching alcoholism patients to recommended levels of care. A cohort of 248 patients newly admitted to inpatient rehabilitation, intensive outpatient, or regular outpatient care was evaluated using both a computerized algorithm and a clinical evaluation protocol to determine whether they were naturalistically matched or mismatched to care. Outcomes were assessed three months after intake. One common type of undertreatment (ie, receiving regular outpatient care when intensive outpatient care was recommended) predicted poorer drinking outcomes as compared with matched treatment, independent of actual level of care received. Overtreatment did not improve outcomes. There also was a trend for better outcomes with residential vs. intensive outpatient treatment, independent of matching. Results were robust for both methods of assessment. Corroboration by more research is needed, but the ASAM Criteria show promise for reducing both detrimental undertreatment and cost-inefficient overtreatment.

Predictors Of Drinking Outcomes Among Alcoholics

“…This study, part of a larger research project on alcoholism treatment outcomes (9), attempts to avoid these six limitations. Based on data from a multimodality treatment program, a naturalistic longitudinal design is used to examine preadmission predictors of drinking outcomes for alcoholics.…”

Out-of-Home Placement Decision-Making and Outcomes in Child Welfare: A Longitudinal Study

“…Given a priori guidance on operationalizing concordance and discordance (Chor et al 2013; Magura et al 2003), state child welfare systems that invest in multiple decision-making models to inform best placement practice should consider comparing these models to examine existing patterns of decisions, and how these patterns might impact the children getting placed. This effort can further states’ recommendations to address children’s placement stability by using specialized placement units, specialized caseworkers, and assessment tools (Blakey et al 2012).…”

The Impact of Acculturation, Motivation, and the Therapeutic Alliance on Treatment Retention and Outcomes for Hispanic Drug-Involved Probationers

“…Matching drug user’s clinical needs with level of care is found to result in better outcomes (Gottheil, Thornton, & Weinstein, 2002; McLellan, Grissom, et al, 1997). Lower levels of care than needed can be harmful, and higher levels of care are wasteful of resources (Magura et al, 2003). Drug offenders who need a higher level of care because of their addiction severity are preferably placed in residential modalities (Prendergast, 2009).…”