2018
DOI: 10.11114/bms.v4i3.3297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Validity toward Job Performance of General and Specific Mental Abilities. A Validity Study across Different Occupational Groups

Abstract: There are two main views on the role of cognitive abilities in job performance prediction. The first approach is based on meta-analysis and incremental validity analysis research and the main assumption is that general mental ability (GMA) is the best job performance predictor regardless of the occupation. The second approach, referred to as specific validity theory, assumes that job-unique weighting of different specific mental abilities (SMA) is a better predictor of job performance than GMA and occupational… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They did a study on the five principles of Traits and found out that some of the principles have no significant relationship to performance. Grobelny (2018) that he also found out that the general and specific mental abilities which are also professional skills predicted for Job performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They did a study on the five principles of Traits and found out that some of the principles have no significant relationship to performance. Grobelny (2018) that he also found out that the general and specific mental abilities which are also professional skills predicted for Job performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, GMA and the Big Five were measured on a higher, more abstract level (i.e., broad concepts), because we wanted to study GMA and the Big Five on the same level of abstraction as reported in well-known meta-analyses (Schmidt and Hunter, 1998; e.g., . Some studies highlight the role of narrow personality traits (e.g., facets of conscientiousness) and specific aptitudes (e.g., psychomotor abilities) as predictors of job performance (e.g., Schmidt, 2002;Dudley et al, 2006;Grobelny, 2018) as well. Additionally, character strengths and facets of the Big Five overlap (e.g., perseverance as a character strength with achievement thriving and self-discipline as facets of conscientiousness, self-regulation as a character strength with impulsiveness as a facet of neuroticism), although they are not redundant (Noftle et al, 2011;McGrath et al, 2020).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%