2022
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Value of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and New Early Warning Signs Scores Estimate Mortality of COVID-19 Patients Requiring Intensive Care Unit

Abstract: A bstract Introduction Various mortality predictive score models for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) have been deliberated. We studied how sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), and new early warning signs (NEWS-2) scores estimate mortality in COVID-19 patients. Materials and methods We conducted a prospective cohort study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Asmarawati et al published in this issue of the journal compared the utility of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II), and new early warning signs (NEWS-2) scores estimate mortality of COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU). 3 We would like to underscore a few important observations about this study. Firstly, the 4 scoring systems used in the study are of diverse genre, some of them being used primarily as triaging/screening tools in high workload areas, in-patient wards (qSOFA and NEWS-2) to define the level of care, while SOFA is used to define the various organ dysfunction/failure, while APACHE II takes other factors also into account, like age, comorbid illnesses apart from physiological disturbances ( Table 1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The study by Asmarawati et al published in this issue of the journal compared the utility of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II), and new early warning signs (NEWS-2) scores estimate mortality of COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU). 3 We would like to underscore a few important observations about this study. Firstly, the 4 scoring systems used in the study are of diverse genre, some of them being used primarily as triaging/screening tools in high workload areas, in-patient wards (qSOFA and NEWS-2) to define the level of care, while SOFA is used to define the various organ dysfunction/failure, while APACHE II takes other factors also into account, like age, comorbid illnesses apart from physiological disturbances ( Table 1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…APACHE-II ve SOFA skorları, kritik hastaları değerlendirmek ve mortalite tahmini için uzun yıllardır kullanılan skorlama sistemleridir (26). Her ne kadar birkaç çalışmada COVID-19 hastalarının mortalite tahminine yönelik yeni spesifik skorlama sistemleri kullanılmışsa da hâlen kritik hastalarda uzun yıllardır uygulanan tanıdık ve mevcut skorlama sistemleri COVID-19 hastalarının değerlendirilmesinde de yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır (27)(28)(29). Çalışmamızda literatürle uyumlu bir şekilde APACHE-II ve SOFA skorları sağ kalan hastalara göre ölen hastalarda anlamlı yüksek bulunmuş ve bu iki skorun çok değişkenli regresyon analizinde mortaliteyi tahmin etmede anlamlı olarak etkili olduğu gösterilmiştir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…It was developed and modified from a previous study database for specific healthcare workers. 18,19 Universitas Airlangga Hospital Ethical Committee had approved this study with the ethical clearance number: 174/KEP/2021.…”
Section: Population Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%